lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83cf8fa7-c8c7-4d3c-9f6f-6a596644b974@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 11:48:41 -0800
From: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>,
 "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "mhkelley58@...il.com" <mhkelley58@...il.com>,
 "haiyangz@...rosoft.com" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
 "kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
 "wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
 "decui@...rosoft.com" <decui@...rosoft.com>,
 "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
 "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mshyperv: Introduce hv_get_hypervisor_version function

On 3/7/2024 11:22 AM, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2024 4:48 PM
>>
>> Introduce x86_64 and arm64 functions for getting the hypervisor version
>> information and storing it in a structure for simpler parsing.
>>
>> Use the new function to get and parse the version at boot time. While at
>> it, print the version in the same format for each architecture, and move
>> the printing code to hv_common_init() so it is not duplicated.
> 
> Isn't the format already the same for x86 and ARM64?   A couple of
> years ago they didn't match.  But that was fixed in commit eeda29db98f4.
> 

You're correct - I will amend the commit message. Thanks!

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>
>> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c      | 19 ++++++++---------
>>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c    | 35 ++++++++++++++-----------------
>>  drivers/hv/hv_common.c            |  9 ++++++++
>>  include/asm-generic/hyperv-tlfs.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h    |  2 ++
>>  5 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c
>> b/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c
>> index f1b8a04ee9f2..55dc224d466d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c
>> @@ -19,10 +19,18 @@
>>
>>  static bool hyperv_initialized;
>>
>> +int hv_get_hypervisor_version(union hv_hypervisor_version_info *info)
>> +{
>> +	hv_get_vpreg_128(HV_REGISTER_HYPERVISOR_VERSION,
>> +			 (struct hv_get_vp_registers_output *)info);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hv_get_hypervisor_version);
> 
> I don't think this need to be exported, at least not for the usage in
> this patch.  The caller in hv_common.c is never part of a module -- it's
> always built-in. But maybe you are anticipating future use cases
> from a module?
> 

Yes, it will be used in a module eventually. Do you think I should remove
this and the below export until they are actually needed?

>> +
>>  static int __init hyperv_init(void)
>>  {
>>  	struct hv_get_vp_registers_output	result;
>> -	u32	a, b, c, d;
>>  	u64	guest_id;
>>  	int	ret;
>>
>> @@ -54,15 +62,6 @@ static int __init hyperv_init(void)
>>  		ms_hyperv.features, ms_hyperv.priv_high, ms_hyperv.hints,
>>  		ms_hyperv.misc_features);
>>
>> -	/* Get information about the Hyper-V host version */
>> -	hv_get_vpreg_128(HV_REGISTER_HYPERVISOR_VERSION, &result);
>> -	a = result.as32.a;
>> -	b = result.as32.b;
>> -	c = result.as32.c;
>> -	d = result.as32.d;
>> -	pr_info("Hyper-V: Host Build %d.%d.%d.%d-%d-%d\n",
>> -		b >> 16, b & 0xFFFF, a,	d & 0xFFFFFF, c, d >> 24);
>> -
>>  	ret = hv_common_init();
>>  	if (ret)
>>  		return ret;
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
>> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
>> index d306f6184cee..03a3445faf7a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
>> @@ -350,13 +350,25 @@ static void __init reduced_hw_init(void)
>>  	x86_init.irqs.pre_vector_init	= x86_init_noop;
>>  }
>>
>> +int hv_get_hypervisor_version(union hv_hypervisor_version_info *info)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned int hv_max_functions;
>> +
>> +	hv_max_functions = cpuid_eax(HYPERV_CPUID_VENDOR_AND_MAX_FUNCTIONS);
>> +	if (hv_max_functions < HYPERV_CPUID_VERSION) {
>> +		pr_err("%s: Could not detect Hyper-V version\n", __func__);
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	cpuid(HYPERV_CPUID_VERSION, &info->eax, &info->ebx, &info->ecx, &info->edx);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hv_get_hypervisor_version);
> 
> Same for this EXPORT.
>>> +
>>  static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
>>  {
>>  	int hv_max_functions_eax;
>> -	int hv_host_info_eax;
>> -	int hv_host_info_ebx;
>> -	int hv_host_info_ecx;
>> -	int hv_host_info_edx;
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>>  	pv_info.name = "Hyper-V";
>> @@ -407,21 +419,6 @@ static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
>>  		pr_info("Hyper-V: running on a nested hypervisor\n");
>>  	}
>>
>> -	/*
>> -	 * Extract host information.
>> -	 */
>> -	if (hv_max_functions_eax >= HYPERV_CPUID_VERSION) {
>> -		hv_host_info_eax = cpuid_eax(HYPERV_CPUID_VERSION);
>> -		hv_host_info_ebx = cpuid_ebx(HYPERV_CPUID_VERSION);
>> -		hv_host_info_ecx = cpuid_ecx(HYPERV_CPUID_VERSION);
>> -		hv_host_info_edx = cpuid_edx(HYPERV_CPUID_VERSION);
>> -
>> -		pr_info("Hyper-V: Host Build %d.%d.%d.%d-%d-%d\n",
>> -			hv_host_info_ebx >> 16, hv_host_info_ebx & 0xFFFF,
>> -			hv_host_info_eax, hv_host_info_edx & 0xFFFFFF,
>> -			hv_host_info_ecx, hv_host_info_edx >> 24);
>> -	}
>> -
>>  	if (ms_hyperv.features & HV_ACCESS_FREQUENCY_MSRS &&
>>  	    ms_hyperv.misc_features & HV_FEATURE_FREQUENCY_MSRS_AVAILABLE) {
>>  		x86_platform.calibrate_tsc = hv_get_tsc_khz;
>> diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_common.c b/drivers/hv/hv_common.c
>> index 2f1dd4b07f9a..4d72c528af68 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hv/hv_common.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_common.c
>> @@ -278,6 +278,15 @@ static void hv_kmsg_dump_register(void)
>>  int __init hv_common_init(void)
>>  {
>>  	int i;
>> +	union hv_hypervisor_version_info version;
>> +
>> +	/* Get information about the Hyper-V host version */
>> +	if (hv_get_hypervisor_version(&version) == 0) {
> 
> The usual idiom would be:
> 
> 	if (!hv_get_hypervisor_version(&version)) {
>
Thanks, I'll change it.
 
>> +		pr_info("Hyper-V: Host Build %d.%d.%d.%d-%d-%d\n",
>> +			version.major_version, version.minor_version,
>> +			version.build_number, version.service_number,
>> +			version.service_pack, version.service_branch);
>> +	}
>>
>>  	if (hv_is_isolation_supported())
>>  		sysctl_record_panic_msg = 0;
>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/hyperv-tlfs.h b/include/asm-generic/hyperv-tlfs.h
>> index 3d1b31f90ed6..32514a870b98 100644
>> --- a/include/asm-generic/hyperv-tlfs.h
>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/hyperv-tlfs.h
>> @@ -817,6 +817,29 @@ struct hv_input_unmap_device_interrupt {
>>  #define HV_SOURCE_SHADOW_NONE               0x0
>>  #define HV_SOURCE_SHADOW_BRIDGE_BUS_RANGE   0x1
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Version info reported by hypervisor
>> + */
>> +union hv_hypervisor_version_info {
>> +	struct {
>> +		u32 build_number;
>> +
>> +		u32 minor_version : 16;
>> +		u32 major_version : 16;
>> +
>> +		u32 service_pack;
>> +
>> +		u32 service_number : 24;
>> +		u32 service_branch : 8;
>> +	};
>> +	struct {
>> +		u32 eax;
>> +		u32 ebx;
>> +		u32 ecx;
>> +		u32 edx;
> 
> Nit:  These names are x86-isms appearing in the generic portion
> of hyperv-tlfs.h.  On the ARM64 side I had called the four parts
> "a", "b", "c", and "d" to be slightly more generic.  But if want to
> keep the x86 register names, I won't object.
> > Michael
> 

Good point. It's worth noting that these are now only used on the x86
side as arguments to cpuid(), so I might just leave them as-is.
Another option would be to add an x86-only union for this purpose:

union hv_x86_hypervisor_version_info {
	struct hv_hypervisor_version_info info;
	struct {
		u32 eax;
		u32 ebx;
		u32 ecx;
		u32 edx;
	};
};

But that is probably overkill...

Thanks for the comments!

Nuno

>> +	};
>> +};
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * The whole argument should fit in a page to be able to pass to the hypervisor
>>   * in one hypercall.
>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h b/include/asm-
>> generic/mshyperv.h
>> index 04424a446bb7..452b7c089b71 100644
>> --- a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
>> @@ -161,6 +161,8 @@ static inline void vmbus_signal_eom(struct
>> hv_message *msg, u32 old_msg_type)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>
>> +int hv_get_hypervisor_version(union hv_hypervisor_version_info *info);
>> +
>>  void hv_setup_vmbus_handler(void (*handler)(void));
>>  void hv_remove_vmbus_handler(void);
>>  void hv_setup_stimer0_handler(void (*handler)(void));
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ