lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:18:14 -0800
From: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, 
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>, 
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, 
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] drm/panel-edp: Fix AUO 0x405c panel naming and add
 a variant

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:28 AM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intelcom> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 06 Mar 2024, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:04 PM Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> @@ -1009,6 +1009,19 @@ static const struct panel_desc auo_b101ean01 = {
> >>         },
> >>  };
> >>
> >> +static const struct drm_display_mode auo_b116xa3_mode = {
> >> +       .clock = 70589,
> >> +       .hdisplay = 1366,
> >> +       .hsync_start = 1366 + 40,
> >> +       .hsync_end = 1366 + 40 + 40,
> >> +       .htotal = 1366 + 40 + 40 + 32,
> >> +       .vdisplay = 768,
> >> +       .vsync_start = 768 + 10,
> >> +       .vsync_end = 768 + 10 + 12,
> >> +       .vtotal = 768 + 10 + 12 + 6,
> >> +       .flags = DRM_MODE_FLAG_NVSYNC | DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>  static const struct drm_display_mode auo_b116xak01_mode = {
> >>         .clock = 69300,
> >>         .hdisplay = 1366,
> >> @@ -1990,7 +2003,9 @@ static const struct edp_panel_entry edp_panels[] = {
> >>         EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('A', 'U', 'O', 0x239b, &delay_200_500_e50, "B116XAN06.1"),
> >>         EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('A', 'U', 'O', 0x255c, &delay_200_500_e50, "B116XTN02.5"),
> >>         EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('A', 'U', 'O', 0x403d, &delay_200_500_e50, "B140HAN04.0"),
> >> -       EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('A', 'U', 'O', 0x405c, &auo_b116xak01.delay, "B116XAK01.0"),
> >> +       EDP_PANEL_ENTRY('A', 'U', 'O', 0x405c, &auo_b116xak01.delay, "B116XAN04.0"),
> >> +       EDP_PANEL_ENTRY2('A', 'U', 'O', 0x405c, &auo_b116xak01.delay, "B116XAK01.0 ",
> >
> > Remove the trailing space from the string above now?
>
> Maybe it actually needs to be considered part of the name; see my other
> reply in the earlier patch.
>
I randomly checked 3 of the AUO panels that I had a datasheet with,
and all of them have a white space padding before \n.
The descriptor of that field is marked as "Reserved for definition",
unlike other characters, representing the name, which are marked with
"Manufacture P/N".

For this example, do we still want to consider the white space part of
the name? I know they didn't follow the spec exactly.

> >
> > Aside from that:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ