[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240308083415.640fe691@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 08:34:15 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Al Viro
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Alessio Balsini <balsini@...roid.com>, Amir
Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the fuse tree with Linus' tree
Hi Miklos,
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:16:00 +0100 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 00:34, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> > diff --cc fs/fuse/inode.c
> > index 516ea2979a90,02869edf72f3..000000000000
> > --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> > @@@ -930,14 -942,6 +942,16 @@@ void fuse_conn_init(struct fuse_conn *f
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_conn_init);
> >
> > +static void delayed_release(struct rcu_head *p)
> > +{
> > + struct fuse_conn *fc = container_of(p, struct fuse_conn, rcu);
> > +
> > + put_user_ns(fc->user_ns);
> > ++ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUSE_PASSTHROUGH))
> > ++ fuse_backing_files_free(fc);
> > + fc->release(fc);
> > +}
> > +
>
> fuse_backing_files_free() doesn't need to be called after an RCU
> delay, so it should be resolved like this:
>
> diff --cc fs/fuse/inode.c
> index 516ea2979a90,02869edf72f3..000000000000
> --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> @@@ -954,7 -959,9 +966,9 @@@ void fuse_conn_put(struct fuse_conn *fc
> WARN_ON(atomic_read(&bucket->count) != 1);
> kfree(bucket);
> }
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUSE_PASSTHROUGH))
> + fuse_backing_files_free(fc);
> - fc->release(fc);
> + call_rcu(&fc->rcu, delayed_release);
> }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_conn_put);
Thanks, I will do that from today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists