lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240307214245.GA3110385-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:42:45 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: mpe@...erman.id.au, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jarkko@...nel.org, rnsastry@...ux.ibm.com, peterhuewe@....de,
	viparash@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Preserve TPM log across kexec

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 11:08:20AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/6/24 10:55, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > This series resolves an issue on PowerVM and KVM on Power where the memory
> > the TPM log was held in may become inaccessible or corrupted after a kexec
> > soft reboot. The solution on these two platforms is to store the whole log
> > in the device tree because the device tree is preserved across a kexec with
> > either of the two kexec syscalls.
> > 
> FYI: This was the previous attempt that didn't work with the older kexec
> syscall: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4afde78d-e138-9eee-50e0-dbd32f4dcfe0@linux.ibm.com/T/#m158630d214837e41858b03d4b025e6f96cb8f251

Doesn't everyone else still need that? Is powerpc the only ones that 
care about the old kexec syscall?

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ