Message-ID: <10a95079-86e4-41bf-8e82-e387936c437d@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 19:18:57 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: kent.overstreet@...ux.dev, mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
 hannes@...xchg.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, mgorman@...e.de,
 dave@...olabs.net, willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com,
 penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, corbet@....net, void@...ifault.com,
 peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
 will@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
 dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, peterx@...hat.com,
 david@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, mcgrof@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
 nathan@...nel.org, dennis@...nel.org, jhubbard@...dia.com, tj@...nel.org,
 muchun.song@...ux.dev, rppt@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
 pasha.tatashin@...een.com, yosryahmed@...gle.com, yuzhao@...gle.com,
 dhowells@...hat.com, hughd@...gle.com, andreyknvl@...il.com,
 keescook@...omium.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com, vvvvvv@...gle.com,
 gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, ebiggers@...gle.com, ytcoode@...il.com,
 vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
 bsegall@...gle.com, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, cl@...ux.com,
 penberg@...nel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
 glider@...gle.com, elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
 shakeelb@...gle.com, songmuchun@...edance.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
 aliceryhl@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com,
 kaleshsingh@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
 kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 37/37] memprofiling: Documentation

Hi,
This includes some editing suggestions and some doc build fixes.


On 3/6/24 10:24, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
> 
> Provide documentation for memory allocation profiling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/mm/allocation-profiling.rst | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/mm/allocation-profiling.rst
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/mm/allocation-profiling.rst b/Documentation/mm/allocation-profiling.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8a862c7d3aab
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/mm/allocation-profiling.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +===========================
> +MEMORY ALLOCATION PROFILING
> +===========================
> +
> +Low overhead (suitable for production) accounting of all memory allocations,
> +tracked by file and line number.
> +
> +Usage:
> +kconfig options:
> + - CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING
> + - CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT
> + - CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG
> +   adds warnings for allocations that weren't accounted because of a
> +   missing annotation
> +
> +Boot parameter:
> +  sysctl.vm.mem_profiling=0|1|never
> +
> +  When set to "never", memory allocation profiling overheads is minimized and it

                                                      overhead is

> +  cannot be enabled at runtime (sysctl becomes read-only).
> +  When CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT=y, default value is "1".
> +  When CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT=n, default value is "never".
> +
> +sysctl:
> +  /proc/sys/vm/mem_profiling
> +
> +Runtime info:
> +  /proc/allocinfo
> +
> +Example output:
> +  root@...ia-kvm:~# sort -g /proc/allocinfo|tail|numfmt --to=iec
> +        2.8M    22648 fs/kernfs/dir.c:615 func:__kernfs_new_node
> +        3.8M      953 mm/memory.c:4214 func:alloc_anon_folio
> +        4.0M     1010 drivers/staging/ctagmod/ctagmod.c:20 [ctagmod] func:ctagmod_start
> +        4.1M        4 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:2567 func:nf_ct_alloc_hashtable
> +        6.0M     1532 mm/filemap.c:1919 func:__filemap_get_folio
> +        8.8M     2785 kernel/fork.c:307 func:alloc_thread_stack_node
> +         13M      234 block/blk-mq.c:3421 func:blk_mq_alloc_rqs
> +         14M     3520 mm/mm_init.c:2530 func:alloc_large_system_hash
> +         15M     3656 mm/readahead.c:247 func:page_cache_ra_unbounded
> +         55M     4887 mm/slub.c:2259 func:alloc_slab_page
> +        122M    31168 mm/page_ext.c:270 func:alloc_page_ext
> +===================
> +Theory of operation
> +===================
> +
> +Memory allocation profiling builds off of code tagging, which is a library for
> +declaring static structs (that typcially describe a file and line number in

                                  typically

> +some way, hence code tagging) and then finding and operating on them at runtime

                                                                        at runtime,

> +- i.e. iterating over them to print them in debugfs/procfs.

  i.e., iterating

> +
> +To add accounting for an allocation call, we replace it with a macro
> +invocation, alloc_hooks(), that
> + - declares a code tag
> + - stashes a pointer to it in task_struct
> + - calls the real allocation function
> + - and finally, restores the task_struct alloc tag pointer to its previous value.
> +
> +This allows for alloc_hooks() calls to be nested, with the most recent one
> +taking effect. This is important for allocations internal to the mm/ code that
> +do not properly belong to the outer allocation context and should be counted
> +separately: for example, slab object extension vectors, or when the slab
> +allocates pages from the page allocator.
> +
> +Thus, proper usage requires determining which function in an allocation call
> +stack should be tagged. There are many helper functions that essentially wrap
> +e.g. kmalloc() and do a little more work, then are called in multiple places;
> +we'll generally want the accounting to happen in the callers of these helpers,
> +not in the helpers themselves.
> +
> +To fix up a given helper, for example foo(), do the following:
> + - switch its allocation call to the _noprof() version, e.g. kmalloc_noprof()
> + - rename it to foo_noprof()
> + - define a macro version of foo() like so:
> +   #define foo(...) alloc_hooks(foo_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
> +
> +It's also possible to stash a pointer to an alloc tag in your own data structures.
> +
> +Do this when you're implementing a generic data structure that does allocations
> +"on behalf of" some other code - for example, the rhashtable code. This way,
> +instead of seeing a large line in /proc/allocinfo for rhashtable.c, we can
> +break it out by rhashtable type.
> +
> +To do so:
> + - Hook your data structure's init function, like any other allocation function

maybe end the line above with a '.' like the following line.

> + - Within your init function, use the convenience macro alloc_tag_record() to
> +   record alloc tag in your data structure.
> + - Then, use the following form for your allocations:
> +   alloc_hooks_tag(ht->your_saved_tag, kmalloc_noprof(...))


Finally, there are a number of documentation build warnings in this patch.
I'm no ReST expert, but the attached patch fixes them for me.

-- 
#Randy
View attachment "docum-mm-alloc-profiling-fix403.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2965 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists