linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/31] ntsync: Introduce NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024030721-expletive-repose-0a89@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 22:12:04 +0000
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, wine-devel@...ehq.org,
	André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
	Arkadiusz Hiler <ahiler@...eweavers.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/31] ntsync: Introduce NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_SEM.

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:38:04PM -0600, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
> This corresponds to the NT syscall NtCreateSemaphore().
> 
> Semaphores are one of three types of object to be implemented in this driver,
> the others being mutexes and events.
> 
> An NT semaphore contains a 32-bit counter, and is signaled and can be acquired
> when the counter is nonzero. The counter has a maximum value which is specified
> at creation time. The initial value of the semaphore is also specified at
> creation time. There are no restrictions on the maximum and initial value.
> 
> Each object is exposed as an file, to which any number of fds may be opened.
> When all fds are closed, the object is deleted.
> 
> Objects hold a pointer to the ntsync_device that created them. The device's
> reference count is driven by struct file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>

I want to take these, but I need someone who knows how to review
locking/sync primitives to give it a review to verify that it is working
properly within the kernel constraints we have here.

Anyone want to give it a review?

thanks,

greg k-h