[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <422szb2dtgnq56xznfqsqtqs3dai2jipnntrp6yb2og353whs7@g4ia5ynnmqu6>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 00:01:48 +0100
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] i2c: nomadik: simplify IRQ masking logic
Hi Theo,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 06:59:23PM +0100, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> IRQ_MASK and I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS both mask available interrupts. IRQ_MASK
> removes top options (bits 29-31). I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS removes reserved
> options including top bits. Keep the latter.
>
> 31 29 27 25 23 21 19 17 15 13 11 09 07 05 03 01
> 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 08 06 04 02 00
> --- IRQ_MASK: --------------------------------------------------
> 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> 0 0 0
> --- I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS: ----------------------------------------
> 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>
> Notice I2C_CLEAR_ALL_INTS is more restrictive than IRQ_MASK.
>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
You did answer my question in v2, thanks, Theo!
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists