linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: core: enable CCI support for AMD-xilinx DWC3 controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 08:45:55 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
To: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
 "Pandey, Radhey Shyam" <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
Cc: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "git (AMD-Xilinx)" <git@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: core: enable CCI support for AMD-xilinx
 DWC3 controller



On 3/7/24 02:44, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024, Pandey, Radhey Shyam wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
>>> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2024 4:38 AM
>>> To: Pandey, Radhey Shyam <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
>>> Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-usb@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; git (AMD-Xilinx) <git@....com>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: core: enable CCI support for AMD-xilinx
>>> DWC3 controller
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
>>>>> From: Piyush Mehta <piyush.mehta@....com>
>>>>>
>>>>> The GSBUSCFG0 register bits [31:16] are used to configure the cache type
>>>>> settings of the descriptor and data write/read transfers (Cacheable,
>>>>> Bufferable/ Posted). When CCI is enabled in the design, DWC3 core
>>> GSBUSCFG0
>>>>> cache bits must be updated to support CCI enabled transfers in USB.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Piyush Mehta <piyush.mehta@....com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey
>>> <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
>>>>> ----
>>>>> changes for v2:
>>>>> Make GSBUSCFG0 configuration specific to AMD-xilinx platform.
>>>>> Taken reference from existing commit ec5eb43813a4 ("usb: dwc3: core:
>>>>> add support for realtek SoCs custom's global register start address")
>>>
>>> Regarding that change from Realtek, it's a special case. I want to avoid
>>> doing platform specific checks in the core.c if possible. Eventually, I
>>> want to move that logic from Realtek to its glue driver.
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Thinh
>> Thanks. As you suggested I tried "temporarily memory map and update this
>> register in your Xilinx glue driver. Its value should retain after soft reset".
>>
>> Did ioremap for core register space once again in glue driver but it resulted
>> in below error:
>> dwc3 fe200000.usb: can't request region for resource [mem 0xfe200000-0xfe23ffff]
>> dwc3-xilinx ff9d0000.usb: error -EBUSY: failed to map DWC3 registers
>>
>> So to avoid remapping, now get the struct dwc3 platform data handle in glue
>> driver and pass it to dwc3_readl/writel() like the below sequence. Is that fine?
>> If yes I will respin v3 with these changes and also do some more
>> sanity tests.
>>
>> drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-xilinx.c
>> #include "io.h"
>>
>> <snip>
>> ret = of_platform_populate(np, NULL, NULL, dev);
>> if (ret) {
>> 	dev_err(dev, "failed to register dwc3 core - %d\n", ret);
>>      goto err_clk_put;
>> }
>>
>> dwc3_np = of_get_compatible_child(np, "snps,dwc3");
>> priv_data->dwc3 = of_find_device_by_node(dwc3_np);
>> dwc = platform_get_drvdata(priv_data->dwc3);
>> if (of_dma_is_coherent(dev->of_node)) {
>> 	reg = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs , DWC3_GSBUSCFG0);
>> 	reg |= DWC3_GSBUSCFG0_DATRDREQINFO_MASK |
>>                DWC3_GSBUSCFG0_DESRDREQINFO_MASK |
>>                DWC3_GSBUSCFG0_DATWRREQINFO_MASK |
>>                DWC3_GSBUSCFG0_DESWRREQINFO_MASK;
> 
> It's a bit odd to use "mask" as value instead of some defined
> macros/values.
> 
>> 	dwc3_writel(dwc->regs , DWC3_GSBUSCFG0, reg);
>> }
>>
> 
> Perhaps it may be better to add a new interface for the core to interact
> with the glue drivers. The core can use these callbacks to properly set
> platform specific configuration at specified sequence of the controller
> initialization. It will be better defined and more predictable than what
> we have here. What do you think?

Not sure I fully understand what you mean by more predictable.
Are you asking for simple read/write interface to dwc3 core IP?
Do you want there any limitation for accesses to be able to control it?

I don't think we have any issue with your suggestion but it is unclear how 
exactly it should look like.
Can you please sketch it?

Thanks,
Michal