linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ASoC: fsl: imx-rpmsg: Update to correct DT node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3509c637-23f0-4e7e-847f-bf3f4f3bf8a0@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:23:58 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Chancel Liu <chancel.liu@....com>, shengjiu.wang@...il.com,
 Xiubo.Lee@...il.com, festevam@...il.com, nicoleotsuka@...il.com,
 lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
 shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
 linux-imx@....com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
 linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ASoC: fsl: imx-rpmsg: Update to correct DT node

On 07/03/2024 08:44, Chancel Liu wrote:
> Platform device for card to probe is registered in imx-audio-rpmsg.
> According to this change DT node of ASoC CPU DAI device is updated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chancel Liu <chancel.liu@....com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/fsl/imx-rpmsg.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/imx-rpmsg.c b/sound/soc/fsl/imx-rpmsg.c
> index e5bd63dab10c..2686125b3043 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/imx-rpmsg.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/imx-rpmsg.c
> @@ -108,10 +108,9 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_late_probe(struct snd_soc_card *card)
>  static int imx_rpmsg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct snd_soc_dai_link_component *dlc;
> -	struct device *dev = pdev->dev.parent;
>  	/* rpmsg_pdev is the platform device for the rpmsg node that probed us */
> -	struct platform_device *rpmsg_pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> -	struct device_node *np = rpmsg_pdev->dev.of_node;
> +	struct platform_device *rpmsg_pdev = NULL;
> +	struct device_node *np = NULL;
>  	struct of_phandle_args args;
>  	const char *platform_name;
>  	struct imx_rpmsg *data;
> @@ -127,6 +126,22 @@ static int imx_rpmsg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto fail;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!strcmp(pdev->dev.platform_data, "rpmsg-micfil-channel"))
> +		np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "rpmsg_micfil");
> +	else
> +		np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "rpmsg_audio");

Why do you create ABI on node names? Where is it documented? Why can't
you use phandles?

Best regards,
Krzysztof