[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <170980005216.6042.11359885960417882116@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 10:27:32 +0200
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@...el.com>, Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2024-03-07 04:10:27)
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 984318aaf7b6 ("drm/i915/panelreplay: Move out psr_init_dpcd() from init_connector()")
>
> from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:
>
> e60cff453b82 ("drm/i915/dp: Enable DP tunnel BW allocation mode")
>
> from the drm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 94d2a15d8444,6ece2c563c7a..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@@ -5699,9 -5702,13 +5702,16 @@@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *c
> goto out;
> }
>
> + ret = intel_dp_tunnel_detect(intel_dp, ctx);
> + if (ret == -EDEADLK)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (ret == 1)
> + intel_connector->base.epoch_counter++;
> +
> + if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> + intel_psr_init_dpcd(intel_dp);
> +
Hi,
This is the right resolution, should be cleared up shortly once the
drm-intel-fixes PR is pulled.
Regards, Joonas
> intel_dp_detect_dsc_caps(intel_dp, intel_connector);
>
> intel_dp_configure_mst(intel_dp);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists