linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Assume polling-delay(-passive) = 0 when absent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 10:36:40 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
 Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Assume polling-delay(-passive) = 0 when absent

On 25/01/2024 13:11, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> As it stands, setting 0 explicitly feels like spam inside the DTs.
> This series simplifies it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> ---

Applied, thanks

-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog