[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f12831aa-036c-41c6-b3cd-fa1bd86546cf@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 10:43:28 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu, michal.simek@...inx.com,
git@...inx.com, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/ZYNQ ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:REAL TIME CLOCK (RTC) SUBSYSTEM" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: rtc: zynqmp: Add support for
Versal/Versal NET SoCs
On 3/6/24 18:53, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 01:36:34PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Add support for Versal and Versal NET SoCs. Both of them should use the
>> same IP core but differences can be in integration part that's why create
>> separate compatible strings.
>>
>> Also describe optional power-domains property. It is optional because power
>> domain doesn't need to be onwed by non secure firmware hence no access to
>> control it via any driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Change subject
>> - Add compatible string for versal and versal NET
>> - Update commit message to reflect why power domain is optional.
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/xlnx,zynqmp-rtc.yaml | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/xlnx,zynqmp-rtc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/xlnx,zynqmp-rtc.yaml
>> index d1f5eb996dba..5652df8ec121 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/xlnx,zynqmp-rtc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/xlnx,zynqmp-rtc.yaml
>> @@ -18,7 +18,10 @@ allOf:
>>
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> - const: xlnx,zynqmp-rtc
>> + enum:
>> + - xlnx,versal-rtc
>> + - xlnx,versal-net-rtc
>> + - xlnx,zynqmp-rtc
>
> You sure chief? I don't see a driver patch alongside this adding these
> new versal compatibles there, so should these versal compatibles not
> fall back to the zynqmp one?
works for me too.
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists