linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] drm/edid: Add a function to match EDID with identity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJMQK-gy2BW8ySbBfUmKn=rVEyEyzLgMtAu0kS7vc8H=e5ayzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 11:26:45 -0800
From: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, 
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>, 
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, 
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] drm/edid: Add a function to match EDID with identity

On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 12:07 AM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 07 Mar 2024, Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org> wrote:
> > Create a type drm_edid_ident as the identity of an EDID. Currently it
> > contains panel id and monitor name.
> >
> > Create a function that can match a given EDID and an identity:
> > 1. Reject if the panel id doesn't match.
> > 2. If name is not null in identity, try to match it in the detailed timing
> >    blocks. Note that some panel vendors put the monitor name after
> >    EDID_DETAIL_MONITOR_STRING.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
>
> The series seems good to go. Thanks Hsin-Yi and Douglas for the
> constructive collaboration! I believe the end result is better now.
>

Thanks for everyone's suggestions to make it better.

> Thanks,
> Jani.
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel