[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240308202431.948914369@goodmis.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 15:24:04 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
joel@...lfernandes.org,
linke li <lilinke99@...com>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/6] ring-buffer: Fix resetting of shortest_full
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
The "shortest_full" variable is used to keep track of the waiter that is
waiting for the smallest amount on the ring buffer before being woken up.
When a tasks waits on the ring buffer, it passes in a "full" value that is
a percentage. 0 means wake up on any data. 1-100 means wake up from 1% to
100% full buffer.
As all waiters are on the same wait queue, the wake up happens for the
waiter with the smallest percentage.
The problem is that the smallest_full on the cpu_buffer that stores the
smallest amount doesn't get reset when all the waiters are woken up. It
does get reset when the ring buffer is reset (echo > /sys/kernel/tracing/trace).
This means that tasks may be woken up more often then when they want to
be. Instead, have the shortest_full field get reset just before waking up
all the tasks. If the tasks wait again, they will update the shortest_full
before sleeping.
Also add locking around setting of shortest_full in the poll logic, and
change "work" to "rbwork" to match the variable name for rb_irq_work
structures that are used in other places.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20240308184007.485732758@goodmis.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 2c2b0a78b3739 ("ring-buffer: Add percentage of ring buffer full to wake up reader")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 3400f11286e3..aa332ace108b 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -755,8 +755,19 @@ static void rb_wake_up_waiters(struct irq_work *work)
wake_up_all(&rbwork->waiters);
if (rbwork->full_waiters_pending || rbwork->wakeup_full) {
+ /* Only cpu_buffer sets the above flags */
+ struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer =
+ container_of(rbwork, struct ring_buffer_per_cpu, irq_work);
+
+ /* Called from interrupt context */
+ raw_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
rbwork->wakeup_full = false;
rbwork->full_waiters_pending = false;
+
+ /* Waking up all waiters, they will reset the shortest full */
+ cpu_buffer->shortest_full = 0;
+ raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
+
wake_up_all(&rbwork->full_waiters);
}
}
@@ -934,28 +945,33 @@ __poll_t ring_buffer_poll_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table, int full)
{
struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
- struct rb_irq_work *work;
+ struct rb_irq_work *rbwork;
if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) {
- work = &buffer->irq_work;
+ rbwork = &buffer->irq_work;
full = 0;
} else {
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
return EPOLLERR;
cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
- work = &cpu_buffer->irq_work;
+ rbwork = &cpu_buffer->irq_work;
}
if (full) {
- poll_wait(filp, &work->full_waiters, poll_table);
- work->full_waiters_pending = true;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ poll_wait(filp, &rbwork->full_waiters, poll_table);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+ rbwork->full_waiters_pending = true;
if (!cpu_buffer->shortest_full ||
cpu_buffer->shortest_full > full)
cpu_buffer->shortest_full = full;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
} else {
- poll_wait(filp, &work->waiters, poll_table);
- work->waiters_pending = true;
+ poll_wait(filp, &rbwork->waiters, poll_table);
+ rbwork->waiters_pending = true;
}
/*
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists