linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,imx-asrc: update max interrupt numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e0f689e9-db30-468d-8ffb-c809edbf7e7c@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 22:14:40 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl,imx-asrc: update max
 interrupt numbers

On 08/03/2024 19:11, Rob Herring wrote:
>>  
>>    interrupts:
>> -    maxItems: 1
>> +    minItems: 1
>> +    maxItems: 2
>> +    items:
>> +      - description: Combined or receive interrupt
>> +      - description: Transmit interrupt
> 
> Test your patches please because this will have warnings. Or, you can 
> put in *exactly* what I provided because this is not it.
> 
> If you continue to just toss crap at us at the rate you are, the DT 
> maintainers will either just start ignoring your patches or require some 

It happened already, at least for me, by default I move them to the end
of the patch/review queue.

> trusted review by another NXP colleague first (offhand, not sure who 
> that would be which is part of the problem).



Best regards,
Krzysztof