lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:09:59 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...look.com>,
 Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>, Salil Mehta
 <salil.mehta@...wei.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 8/9] net: hisi_femac: add support for
 hisi_femac core on Hi3798MV200

On 08/03/2024 09:07, Yang Xiwen wrote:
> On 3/8/2024 4:02 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 07/03/2024 12:34, Yang Xiwen via B4 Relay wrote:
>>> From: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...look.com>
>>>
>>> Register the sub MDIO bus if it is found. Also implement the internal
>>> PHY reset procedure as needed.
>> ...
>>
>>>   
>>> @@ -946,6 +991,7 @@ static int hisi_femac_drv_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>   
>>>   static const struct of_device_id hisi_femac_match[] = {
>>>   	{.compatible = "hisilicon,hi3516cv300-femac",},
>>> +	{.compatible = "hisilicon,hi3798mv200-femac",},
>>
>> Why do you keep growing this table?
> 
> 
> I'm completely confused. Don't I need to keep binding and driver 
> compatible ids sync?
> 
> 
> The FEMAC cores on 2 SoCs are compatible afaik. That's why i want to add 
> a generic "hisilicon,hisi-femac" compatible. Though i know nothing about 
> the mysterious version numbers (v1, v2 etc..) documented in the old 
> binding, so i want them to be removed. Instead only keep one generic 
> fallback compatible.
> 
> 
> Do you mean that i broke the backward compatibility for 
> "hisilicon,hi3516cv300-femac"?

No. I meant, use one as fallback and only fallback needs to be in the
device ID table. There are dozens if not hundreds of such examples in
the tree.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ