[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240308083129.1796-1-honggyu.kim@sk.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 17:31:25 +0900
From: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@...com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@...com>,
damon@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
apopple@...dia.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
dave.jiang@...el.com,
hyeongtak.ji@...com,
kernel_team@...ynix.com,
linmiaohe@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
mhiramat@...nel.org,
rakie.kim@...com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
surenb@...gle.com,
yangx.jy@...itsu.com,
ying.huang@...el.com,
ziy@...dia.com,
42.hyeyoo@...il.com
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] DAMON based 2-tier memory management for CXL memory
Hi SeongJae,
I couldn't send email to LKML properly due to internal system issues,
but it's better now so I will be able to communicate better.
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 19:05:50 -0800 SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:51:20 -0800 SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 23:05:46 +0900 Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@...com> wrote:
> >
> > > There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously
> > > posted at [1].
> > >
> > > It says there is no implementation of the demote/promote DAMOS action
> > > are made. This RFC is about its implementation for physical address
> > > space.
> [...]
> > Honggyu joined DAMON Beer/Coffee/Tea Chat[1] yesterday, and we discussed about
> > this patchset in high level. Sharing the summary here for open discussion. As
> > also discussed on the first version of this patchset[2], we want to make single
> > action for general page migration with minimum changes, but would like to keep
> > page level access re-check. We also agreed the previously proposed DAMOS
> > filter-based approach could make sense for the purpose.
> >
> > Because I was anyway planning making such DAMOS filter for not only
> > promotion/demotion but other types of DAMOS action, I will start developing the
> > page level access re-check results based DAMOS filter. Once the implementation
> > of the prototype is done, I will share the early implementation. Then, Honggyu
> > will adjust their implementation based on the filter, and run their tests again
> > and share the results.
>
> I just posted an RFC patchset for the page level access re-check DAMOS filter:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240307030013.47041-1-sj@kernel.org
>
> I hope it to help you better understanding and testing the idea.
Thanks very much for your work! I will test it based on your changes.
Thanks,
Honggyu
>
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/damon/20220810225102.124459-1-sj@kernel.org/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/damon/20240118171756.80356-1-sj@kernel.org
>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
> [...]
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists