[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240308084240.GK52537@atomide.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 10:42:40 +0200
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, gregory.clement@...tlin.com,
theo.lebrun@...tlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
u-kumar1@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/18] i2c: omap: wakeup the controller during
suspend() callback
* Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com> [240304 15:36]:
> A device may need the controller up during suspend_noirq() or
> resume_noirq().
> But if the controller is autosuspended, there is no way to wakeup it during
> suspend_noirq() or resume_noirq() because runtime pm is disabled at this
> time.
>
> The suspend() callback wakes up the controller, so it is available until
> its suspend_noirq() callback (pm_runtime_force_suspend()).
> During the resume, it's restored by resume_noirq() callback
> (pm_runtime_force_resume()). Then resume() callback enables autosuspend.
Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists