linux-kernel - [PATCH 01/10] sched/balancing: Switch the 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK(balancing)' spinlock into an 'atomic_t sched_balance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240308105901.1096078-2-mingo@kernel.org>
Date: Fri,  8 Mar 2024 11:58:52 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] sched/balancing: Switch the 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK(balancing)' spinlock into an 'atomic_t sched_balance_running' flag

The 'balancing' spinlock added in:

  08c183f31bdb ("[PATCH] sched: add option to serialize load balancing")

.. is taken when the SD_SERIALIZE flag is set in a domain, but in reality it
is a glorified global atomic flag serializing the load-balancing of
those domains.

It doesn't have any explicit locking semantics per se: we just
spin_trylock() it.

Turn it into a ... global atomic flag. This makes it more
clear what is going on here, and reduces overhead and code
size a bit:

  # kernel/sched/fair.o: [x86-64 defconfig]

     text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
    60730	   2721	    104	  63555	   f843	fair.o.before
    60718	   2721	    104	  63543	   f837	fair.o.after

Also document the flag a bit.

No change in functionality intended.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6a16129f9a5c..2ef89b36aed1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -11633,7 +11633,20 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(balancing);
+/*
+ * This flag serializes load-balancing passes over large domains
+ * (above the NODE topology level) - only one load-balancing instance
+ * may run at a time, to reduce overhead on very large systems with
+ * lots of CPUs and large NUMA distances.
+ *
+ * - Note that load-balancing passes triggered while another one
+ *   is executing are skipped and not re-tried.
+ *
+ * - Also note that this does not serialize rebalance_domains()
+ *   execution, as non-SD_SERIALIZE domains will still be
+ *   load-balanced in parallel.
+ */
+static atomic_t sched_balance_running = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
 
 /*
  * Scale the max load_balance interval with the number of CPUs in the system.
@@ -11711,7 +11724,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
 
 		need_serialize = sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE;
 		if (need_serialize) {
-			if (!spin_trylock(&balancing))
+			if (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&sched_balance_running, 0, 1))
 				goto out;
 		}
 
@@ -11729,7 +11742,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
 			interval = get_sd_balance_interval(sd, busy);
 		}
 		if (need_serialize)
-			spin_unlock(&balancing);
+			atomic_set_release(&sched_balance_running, 0);
 out:
 		if (time_after(next_balance, sd->last_balance + interval)) {
 			next_balance = sd->last_balance + interval;
-- 
2.40.1