lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 13:03:12 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, 
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] sched/balancing: Fix comments (trying to) refer to NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK

On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 11:59, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Fix two typos:
>
>  - There's no such thing as 'nohz_balancing_kick', the
>    flag is named 'BALANCE' and is capitalized:  NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK.
>
>  - Likewise there's no such thing as a 'pending nohz_balance_kick'
>    either, the NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK flag is all upper-case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>

Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>

> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 84d4791cf628..f3c03c6db3c8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -12409,15 +12409,16 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
>  }
>
>  /*
> - * run_rebalance_domains is triggered when needed from the scheduler tick.
> - * Also triggered for nohz idle balancing (with nohz_balancing_kick set).
> + * This softirq may be triggered from the scheduler tick, or by
> + * any of the flags in NOHZ_KICK_MASK: NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK,
> + * NOHZ_STATS_KICK or NOHZ_NEXT_KICK.
>   */
>  static __latent_entropy void run_rebalance_domains(struct softirq_action *h)
>  {
>         struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
>         enum cpu_idle_type idle = this_rq->idle_balance;
>         /*
> -        * If this CPU has a pending nohz_balance_kick, then do the
> +        * If this CPU has a pending NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK, then do the
>          * balancing on behalf of the other idle CPUs whose ticks are
>          * stopped. Do nohz_idle_balance *before* rebalance_domains to
>          * give the idle CPUs a chance to load balance. Else we may
> --
> 2.40.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ