[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240307205044.1caf9fe2@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 20:50:44 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Kassey Li <quic_yingangl@...cinc.com>
Cc: <mhiramat@...nel.org>, <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: add function in event of
workqueue_activate_work
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:09:29 +0800
Kassey Li <quic_yingangl@...cinc.com> wrote:
> The trace event "workqueue_activate_work" only print work struct.
> However, function is the region of interest in a full sequence of work.
> Current workqueue_activate_work trace event output:
>
> workqueue_activate_work: work struct ffffff88b4a0f450
>
> With this change, workqueue_activate_work will print the function name,
> align with workqueue_queue_work/execute_start/execute_end event.
>
> checkpatch.pl will report below error for the space:
>
> ERROR: space prohibited after that open parenthesis '('
> #28: FILE: include/trace/events/workqueue.h:67:
> + __field( void *, function)
>
> total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 16 lines checked
>
> fix this error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kassey Li <quic_yingangl@...cinc.com>
> ---
> include/trace/events/workqueue.h | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/workqueue.h b/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> index 262d52021c23..a42c1a293459 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> @@ -63,14 +63,16 @@ TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_activate_work,
> TP_ARGS(work),
>
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> - __field( void *, work )
> + __field(void *, work)
> + __field(void *, function)
Note, please do not follow checkpatch in TRACE_EVENT() macros. It simply
doesn't understand it. The above is supposed to be similar to structure
formatting.
ie:
struct __entry {
void *work;
void *function;
};
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field( void *, work )
__field( void *, function )
),
That looks much better.
-- Steve
>
> TP_fast_assign(
> __entry->work = work;
> + __entry->function = work->func;
> ),
>
> - TP_printk("work struct %p", __entry->work)
> + TP_printk("work struct %p function=%ps ", __entry->work, __entry->function)
> );
>
> /**
Powered by blists - more mailing lists