linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/packet: Add getsockopt support for PACKET_COPY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <AM6PR03MB5848654CAA0174407FD4DE7299272@AM6PR03MB5848.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 21:19:34 +0800
From: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@...look.com>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/packet: Add getsockopt support for
 PACKET_COPY_THRESH

On 2024/3/8 21:11, Jason Xing wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 8:56 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 1:43 PM Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@...look.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Currently getsockopt does not support PACKET_COPY_THRESH,
>>> and we are unable to get the value of PACKET_COPY_THRESH
>>> socket option through getsockopt.
>>>
>>> This patch adds getsockopt support for PACKET_COPY_THRESH.
>>>
>>> In addition, this patch converts access to copy_thresh to
>>> READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@...look.com>
>>> ---
>>> V1 -> V2: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE.
>>>
>>>   net/packet/af_packet.c | 7 +++++--
>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
>>> index 0db31ca4982d..61270826b9ac 100644
>>> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
>>> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
>>> @@ -2318,7 +2318,7 @@ static int tpacket_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>>>          }
>>>          if (po->tp_version <= TPACKET_V2) {
>>>                  if (macoff + snaplen > po->rx_ring.frame_size) {
>>> -                       if (po->copy_thresh &&
>>> +                       if (READ_ONCE(po->copy_thresh) &&
>>>                              atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) < sk->sk_rcvbuf) {
>>>                                  if (skb_shared(skb)) {
>>>                                          copy_skb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>> @@ -3836,7 +3836,7 @@ packet_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, sockptr_t optval,
>>>                  if (copy_from_sockptr(&val, optval, sizeof(val)))
>>>                          return -EFAULT;
>>>
>>> -               pkt_sk(sk)->copy_thresh = val;
>>> +               WRITE_ONCE(pkt_sk(sk)->copy_thresh, val);
>>>                  return 0;
>>>          }
>>>          case PACKET_VERSION:
>>> @@ -4090,6 +4090,9 @@ static int packet_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
>>>          case PACKET_VNET_HDR_SZ:
>>>                  val = READ_ONCE(po->vnet_hdr_sz);
>>>                  break;
>>> +       case PACKET_COPY_THRESH:
>>> +               val = READ_ONCE(pkt_sk(sk)->copy_thresh);
>>> +               break;
>>>          case PACKET_VERSION:
>>>                  val = po->tp_version;
>>>                  break;
>>> --
>>> 2.39.2
>>>
>>
>> I think you forgot to change net/packet/diag.c pdiag_put_info()
>>
> 
> Ah, he updated his patch so soon even without taking a break.
> 
> I just replied to the v1 thread with three changes made.
> 
> Juntong, you could check your v1 patch thread and you will see the
> missing point.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason

Hi Jason,

Thanks, I have fixed this in the v3 patch.