lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e994734-1d3a-4c51-9c0b-4e2ce945f198@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 14:24:13 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: minchan@...nel.org, fengwei.yin@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 mhocko@...e.com, peterx@...hat.com, shy828301@...il.com,
 songmuchun@...edance.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, xiehuan09@...il.com,
 zokeefe@...gle.com, chrisl@...nel.org, yuzhao@...gle.com,
 Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>, Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: prohibit the last subpage from reusing the entire
 large folio

>>> This patch migrates the last subpage to a small folio and immediately
>>> returns the large folio to the system. It benefits both memory availability
>>> and anti-fragmentation.
>>
>> It might be controversial optimization, and as Ryan said, there, are likely
>> other cases where we'd want to migrate off-of a thp if possible earlier.
> 
> Personally, I think there might also be cases where you want to copy/reuse the
> entire large folio. If you're application is using 16K THPs perhaps it's a
> bigger win to just treat it like a base page? I expect the cost/benefit will
> change as the THP size increases?

Yes, I think for small folios (i.e., 16KiB) it will be rather easy to 
make a decision. The larger the folio, the larger the page fault latency 
due to scanning, copying, modifying, which can easily turn undesirable.

At least when it comes to page reuse, I have some simple backup plans 
for small folios if I won't be able to make progress with my other 
approach. For larger folios, it won't really work/be desirable, though.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ