linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] w1: gpio: A set of cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZesSiO2Oojf5HTLM@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 15:28:40 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] w1: gpio: A set of cleanups

On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 09:34:47AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/03/2024 17:38, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello Andy,
> > 
> > I wonder about your choice of recipients. I would have added Krzysztof
> > to To and me at most to Cc:.
> 
> That's indeed odd (and reminds me Qualcomm proposing wrapper over
> get_maintainers.pl which on purpose put the maintainers in "To:" and
> lists in "Cc:") and I imagine people having filters depending on To: and
> Cc: distinction, but for the record: I don't care. People put it usually
> wrong, so my filters just choose (To Or Cc).
> 
> Anyway all the patches will wait till the end of the merge window.

Fine by me, thank you!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko