linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] spi: xilinx: Add necessary inclusion and forward declaration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6031ff70-d9f8-4e9e-b9be-6d9fa0091b9c@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 16:27:53 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] spi: xilinx: Add necessary inclusion and forward
 declaration



On 3/8/24 16:00, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 03:02:01PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 3/8/24 14:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 09:21:32AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>> On 3/7/24 16:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>> xilinx_spi.h is mnissing inclusion and forward declaration, add them.
> 
> ...
> 
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/spi/xilinx_spi.h b/include/linux/spi/xilinx_spi.h
>>>>>     #define __LINUX_SPI_XILINX_SPI_H
>>>>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +struct spi_board_info;
>>>>> +
>>>>>     /**
>>>>>      * struct xspi_platform_data - Platform data of the Xilinx SPI driver
>>>>>      * @num_chipselect:	Number of chip select by the IP.
>>>>
>>>> Likely correct but forget how to check it with tools.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure which tools we have to check this.
>>>
>>> The types.h is needed for uXX
>>> The forward declaration for the pointer to the mentioned type.
>>>
>>> All this has been derived from reading the file.
>>
>> No issue with it. But I am quite sure there was a tool which was able to
>> find it out and report it. But forgot which one was it.
> 
> You mean iwyu? If so, it needs a lot of tuning before being able to be used
> in Linux kernel.
> 

Acked-by; Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>

Thanks,
Michal