linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/9] sched/balancing: Update run_rebalance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <xhsmhy1asd65m.mognet@vschneid-thinkpadt14sgen2i.remote.csb>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 17:45:09 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Ingo Molnar
 <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Dietmar Eggemann
 <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] sched/balancing: Update run_rebalance_domains()
 comments

On 08/03/24 12:57, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 11:15, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Okay - I updated it to:
>>
>>   /*
>>    * This softirq handler is triggered via SCHED_SOFTIRQ from two places:
>>    *
>>    * - directly from the local scheduler_tick() for periodic load balancing
>>    *
>>    * - indirectly from a remote scheduler_tick() for NOHZ idle balancing
>>    *   through the SMP cross-call nohz_csd_func()
>>    */
>>   static __latent_entropy void run_rebalance_domains(struct softirq_action *h)
>>
>> Does this work with everyone?
>
> yes looks good for me
>

Ditto!