[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tencent_4E77E34FDA2F438430621DF220620A882407@qq.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 21:59:02 +0800
From: linke li <lilinke99@...com>
To: edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: alexander@...alicyn.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
dhowells@...hat.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
kuniyu@...zon.com,
leitao@...ian.org,
lilinke99@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
willemb@...gle.com,
wuyun.abel@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mark racy access on sk->sk_rcvbuf
> OK, but what about __sock_queue_rcv_skb() in the same file ?
I notice that, but I am not very sure whether there is a data race. If it
is a similar situation, then the same patch should be applied too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists