[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZewHqzDi5Juou1rU@archie.me>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 13:54:35 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: regressions@...ts.linux.dev, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Petr Tesařík <petr@...arici.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] docs: verify/bisect: fixes, finetuning, and support
for Arch
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 09:56:47AM +0100, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> On 06.03.24 14:27, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 10:21:12AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.rst
> >> index 54bde8bac95c67..58211840ac6ffb 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.rst
> >> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.rst
> >> @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ will be considered the 'good' release and used to prepare the .config file.
> >>
> >> sudo rm -rf /lib/modules/6.0-rc1-local-gcafec0cacaca0
> >> sudo kernel-install -v remove 6.0-rc1-local-gcafec0cacaca0
> >> - # * Note, if kernel-install is missing, you will have to
> >> - # manually remove the kernel image and related files.
> >> + # * Note, on some distributions kernel-install is missing
> >> + # or does only part of the job.
> >
> > Consult documentation of your distribution for how to manually install/remove
> > the kernel.
>
> That would sent the wrong message in the TLDR, as the step-by-step guide
> and the reference section would be the first place to look for details,
> which is kinda implicit for a TLDR.
>
> That being said: that made me look closer at the install section of the
> guide and the reference section. I think they should mention "consult
> documentation of your distribution" more clearly. I just looked into
> this, but that requires a few bigger changes, so I'll take care of that
> in a later patch I hope to send in the next few days.
>
> >> Install build requirements
> >> --------------------------
> >> @@ -1076,72 +1078,103 @@ about to build.
> >> Here are a few examples what you typically need on some mainstream
> >> distributions:
> >>
> >> +* Arch Linux and derivatives::
> >> +
> >> + sudo pacman --needed -S bc binutils bison flex gcc git kmod libelf openssl \
> >> + pahole perl zlib ncurses qt6-base
> >> +
> >> * Debian, Ubuntu, and derivatives::
> >>
> >> - sudo apt install bc binutils bison dwarves flex gcc git make openssl \
> >> - pahole perl-base libssl-dev libelf-dev
> >> + sudo apt install bc binutils bison dwarves flex gcc git kmod libelf-dev \
> >> + libssl-dev make openssl pahole perl-base pkg-config zlib1g-dev \
> >> + libncurses-dev qt6-base-dev g++
> >>
> >> * Fedora and derivatives::
> >>
> >> - sudo dnf install binutils /usr/include/{libelf.h,openssl/pkcs7.h} \
> >> - /usr/bin/{bc,bison,flex,gcc,git,openssl,make,perl,pahole}
> >> + sudo dnf install binutils \
> >> + /usr/bin/{bc,bison,flex,gcc,git,openssl,make,perl,pahole,rpmbuild} \
> >> + /usr/include/{libelf.h,openssl/pkcs7.h,zlib.h,ncurses.h,qt6/QtGui/QAction}
> >
> > IMO qt packages are for people who wish to do xconfig instead of menuconfig
> > or nconfig.
>
> Well, yes, that's why the patch also added a few lines to point this out
> and mention that installing the qt dev headers is optional. Guess you
> just missed that.
>
OK, thanks!
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists