linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: realtek: keep default LED state in rtl8366rb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 12:47:19 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
 Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: realtek: keep default LED state in
 rtl8366rb

On 10/03/2024 12:37, Simon Horman wrote:
>>>
>>> The code to disable LEDs was simplified only changing each LED group to
>>> the RTL8366RB_LED_OFF state. Registers RTL8366RB_LED_0_1_CTRL_REG and
>>> RTL8366RB_LED_2_3_CTRL_REG are only used when the corresponding LED
>>> group is configured with RTL8366RB_LED_FORCE and they don't need to be
>>> cleaned. The code still references an LED controlled by
>>> RTL8366RB_INTERRUPT_CONTROL_REG, but as of now, no test device has
>>> actually used it. Also, some magic numbers were replaced by macros.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>>
>> This is the first version, so where did review happen?
> 
> FWIIW, I think this relates to review of an RFC of this patch-set.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CACRpkda8tQ2u4+jCrpOQXbBd84oW98vmiDgU+GgdYCHuZfn49A@mail.gmail.com/

OK, then this is v2. RFC is state of patch, not some sort of version. Or
just use b4 which handles this automatically...

Best regards,
Krzysztof