[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7d94072-eb4e-4d67-98d6-8090362a01e2@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:34:10 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Animesh Agarwal <animeshagarwal28@...il.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: imx-pata: Convert to dtschema
On 10/03/2024 14:36, Animesh Agarwal wrote:
> On 10/03/2024 at 18:37 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Please respond inline, instead of top-posting, because it makes your
>> emails hard to follow.
>>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8-rc7/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L340
> <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8-rc7/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L340>
>
> Already taken a note of it, will follow inline here onwards.
>
>>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 11:38 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <
>>> krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 09/03/2024 17:07, Animesh Agarwal wrote:
>>>>> Convert the imx-pata bindings to DT schema.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Animesh Agarwal <animeshagarwal28@...il.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>>> - added fsl,imx51-pata in compatible property
>>>>
>>>> Please explain the differences done during conversion in the commit msg.
>> How did you solve this?
>
> Added proper explanation for fsl,imx51-pata addition in the compatible
> property in commit message of v4.
I don't see anything about this in commit msg. Commit msg is exactly the
same as before. Try yourself - use b4 shazam to apply your patch and see
if commit msg contains that information.
>
>>>> This allows only imx51 and disallows imx27 alone, which is not what old
>> ------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> How did you solve this?
>
> I will resubmit patch v4 with more explanation.
You mean v5? You need oneOf allowing usage of imx27 alone.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists