linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dsa: realtek: describe LED usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 19:52:39 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dsa: realtek: describe
 LED usage

> +                properties:
> +                  reg:
> +                    description:
> +                      "reg indicates the LED group for this LED"
> +                    enum: [0, 1, 2, 3]

Having read the code, i don't think the binding needs to say anything
about the group. It is implicit. Port LED 0 is in group 0. Port LED 1
is in group 1. So there is nothing here which is outside of the
standard LED binding. So as Linus said, i don't think you need any
YAML at all, the DSA port binding should be sufficient.

	Andrew