[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ze4SmVLprCrJi59W@google.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 13:05:45 -0700
From: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@...gle.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Cc: jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
chenxiang66@...ilicon.com, jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com,
artur.paszkiewicz@...el.com, yanaijie@...wei.com,
dlemoal@...nel.org, cassel@...nel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] scsi: libsas: Add LIBSAS_SHT_BASE
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 10:02:42AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 08/03/2024 19:41, Igor Pylypiv wrote:
> > > Even though some drivers don't set proc_name, it won't make much difference
> > > to set as DRV_NAME.
> > >
> > > Also add LIBSAS_SHT_BASE_NO_SLAVE_INIT for the hisi_sas drivers which have
> > > custom .slave_alloc and .slave_configure methods.
> > Looks like libata drivers have no problem overriding default values that were
> > set by __ATA_BASE_SHT. For example __ATA_BASE_SHT sets .can_queue .sdev_attrs
> > and then AHCI_SHT overrides those with AHCI specific values:
> >
> > #define AHCI_SHT(drv_name) \
> > ATA_NCQ_SHT(drv_name), \
>
> which tag are you looking at here?
>
> That looks like an old definition of AHCI_SHT().
>
> There was a significant change for this in the following:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/ata/ahci.h?h=v5.14&id=071e86fe2872e7442e42ad26f71cd6bde55344f8
Oh, my bad. I had some old kernel version checked out. Please disregard.
Reviewed-by: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@...gle.com>
Thanks,
Igor
>
> Thanks,
> John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists