[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba834984-d0d7-4b46-81f6-5a2df8e74944@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 21:25:49 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Animesh Agarwal <animeshagarwal28@...il.com>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] dt-bindings: imx-pata: Convert to dtschema
On 10/03/2024 18:51, Animesh Agarwal wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 11:08 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>> I did not say about subject, but about commit message.
> Ok, I'll add commit message above the change log.
What changelog? Read carefully what I asked you few versions ago:
"Please explain the differences done during conversion in the commit
msg. There was no imx51 compatible in the binding before."
The differences from conversion. There was some binding in TXT and you
convert to different format. You introduce changes beyond pure
conversion, so this must be explained. Again: explain what changes are
you making *to the binding*, which are not pure conversion, and why you
are making them.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists