linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: dts: marvell: Add 7-segment LED display on x530

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <e90c2e69-17ea-4875-bb36-8a6d846f05e6@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:02:35 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>
To: "Chris Packham" <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
 "Andy Shevchenko" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: "Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
 "Andy Shevchenko" <andy@...nel.org>,
 "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
 "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@...n.ch>,
 "Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
 "Lee Jones" <lee@...nel.org>,
 "linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: dts: marvell: Add 7-segment LED display on x530

On Sun, Mar 10, 2024, at 21:22, Chris Packham wrote:
> On 8/03/24 23:34, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 12:19 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, at 10:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 9:36 AM Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Normally, this patch should be taken in mvebu and then merged by
>>>>> arm-soc. However, I haven't seen any other patch touching this file (so
>>>>> no risk of merge conflict) and I think it's too late for me to make a
>>>>> new pull request to arm-soc. So I'm not against it being taken with the
>>>>> rest of the patches. However, I think it would be a good idea to see
>>>>> what Arnd thinks about it.
>
> FYI ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f arch/arm/boot/dts/marvell isn't 
> picking up Arnd should it?

No, as Gregory writes, the intended way for platform specific
patches is to go through the maintainer for that platform,
in this case him, who then sends pull requests to me.

Since it was late in the merge window, he suggested skipping
this step as an exception, which is something we can always do
if there is an important reason, just like you skip can all
maintainers and go directly to Linus if necessary, but the
maintainers file only documents the normal case.

     Arnd