linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: muxes: pca954x: Allow sharing reset GPIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6785b149-a2bc-44ea-aec3-8477222d338b@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:25:30 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>, peda@...ntia.se,
 p.zabel@...gutronix.de
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: muxes: pca954x: Allow sharing reset GPIO

On 11/03/2024 05:14, Chris Packham wrote:
> Some hardware designs with multiple PCA954x devices use a reset GPIO
> connected to all the muxes. Support this configuration by making use of
> the reset controller framework which can deal with the shared reset
> GPIOs. Fall back to the old GPIO descriptor method if the reset
> controller framework is not enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     This patch goes on top of Krzysztof's series adding the GPIO based reset
>     controller[1] which will be in linux-6.9. With this I'm able to
>     correctly describe my hardware platform in the DTS and have the resets
>     appropriately controlled.
>     
>     [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240129115216.96479-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
> 

Where is the changelog? It was v3 or v4 already? Where are the tags?

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof