[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7fb18dc-817e-4d93-94a8-a4b7493cc8a6@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:56:42 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Johnson Wang <johnson.wang@...iatek.com>,
Edward-JW Yang <edward-jw.yang@...iatek.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: pllfh: Don't log error for missing fhctl
node
Il 08/03/24 21:29, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> Support for fhctl clocks in apmixedsys was introduced at a later point
> and to this moment only one mt6795 based platform has a fhctl DT node
> present. Therefore the fhctl support in apmixedsys should be seen as
> optional and not cause an error when it is missing.
>
> Change the message's log level to warning. The warning level is chosen
> so that it will still alert the fact that fhctl support might be
> unintentionally missing, but without implying that this is necessarily
> an issue.
>
> Even if the FHCTL DT nodes are added to all current platforms moving
> forward, since those changes won't be backported, this ensures stable
> kernel releases won't have live with this error.
>
> Fixes: d7964de8a8ea ("clk: mediatek: Add new clock driver to handle FHCTL hardware")
> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists