linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/9] bpf: verifier: add btf to the function args of bpf_check_attach

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240311093526.1010158-6-dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 17:35:22 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <dongmenglong.8@...edance.com>
To: andrii@...nel.org
Cc: ast@...nel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net,
	martin.lau@...ux.dev,
	eddyz87@...il.com,
	song@...nel.org,
	yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
	john.fastabend@...il.com,
	kpsingh@...nel.org,
	sdf@...gle.com,
	haoluo@...gle.com,
	jolsa@...nel.org,
	agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
	svens@...ux.ibm.com,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	dsahern@...nel.org,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
	x86@...nel.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	quentin@...valent.com,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	Menglong Dong <dongmenglong.8@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/9] bpf: verifier: add btf to the function args of bpf_check_attach_target

Add target btf to the function args of bpf_check_attach_target(), then
the caller can specify the btf to check.

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongmenglong.8@...edance.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 1 +
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c         | 6 ++++--
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c      | 1 +
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 8 +++++---
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 4b0f6600e499..6cb20efcfac3 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -811,6 +811,7 @@ static inline void bpf_trampoline_unpack_key(u64 key, u32 *obj_id, u32 *btf_id)
 int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 			    const struct bpf_prog *prog,
 			    const struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog,
+			    struct btf *btf,
 			    u32 btf_id,
 			    struct bpf_attach_target_info *tgt_info);
 void bpf_free_kfunc_btf_tab(struct bpf_kfunc_btf_tab *tab);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index d1cd645ef9ac..6128c3131141 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3401,9 +3401,11 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 		 * need a new trampoline and a check for compatibility
 		 */
 		struct bpf_attach_target_info tgt_info = {};
+		struct btf *btf;
 
-		err = bpf_check_attach_target(NULL, prog, tgt_prog, btf_id,
-					      &tgt_info);
+		btf = tgt_prog ? tgt_prog->aux->btf : prog->aux->attach_btf;
+		err = bpf_check_attach_target(NULL, prog, tgt_prog, btf,
+					      btf_id, &tgt_info);
 		if (err)
 			goto out_unlock;
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index 2167aa3fe583..b00d53af8fcb 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -747,6 +747,7 @@ int bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	int err;
 
 	err = bpf_check_attach_target(NULL, prog, NULL,
+				      prog->aux->attach_btf,
 				      prog->aux->attach_btf_id,
 				      &tgt_info);
 	if (err)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index bf084c693507..4493ecc23597 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -20613,6 +20613,7 @@ static int check_non_sleepable_error_inject(u32 btf_id)
 int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 			    const struct bpf_prog *prog,
 			    const struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog,
+			    struct btf *btf,
 			    u32 btf_id,
 			    struct bpf_attach_target_info *tgt_info)
 {
@@ -20623,7 +20624,6 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 	const struct btf_type *t;
 	bool conservative = true;
 	const char *tname;
-	struct btf *btf;
 	long addr = 0;
 	struct module *mod = NULL;
 
@@ -20631,7 +20631,6 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 		bpf_log(log, "Tracing programs must provide btf_id\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-	btf = tgt_prog ? tgt_prog->aux->btf : prog->aux->attach_btf;
 	if (!btf) {
 		bpf_log(log,
 			"FENTRY/FEXIT program can only be attached to another program annotated with BTF\n");
@@ -20940,6 +20939,7 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	struct bpf_attach_target_info tgt_info = {};
 	u32 btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
 	struct bpf_trampoline *tr;
+	struct btf *btf;
 	int ret;
 	u64 key;
 
@@ -20964,7 +20964,9 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	    prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT)
 		return 0;
 
-	ret = bpf_check_attach_target(&env->log, prog, tgt_prog, btf_id, &tgt_info);
+	btf = tgt_prog ? tgt_prog->aux->btf : prog->aux->attach_btf;
+	ret = bpf_check_attach_target(&env->log, prog, tgt_prog, btf,
+				      btf_id, &tgt_info);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.39.2