[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24e827c3-ea16-4197-8699-f35d67fa9c6a@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:02:05 +0100
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM: Xen and gfn_to_pfn_cache changes for 6.9
On 3/8/24 23:37, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Aaaand seeing my one commit in the shortlog made me realize I completely forgot
> to get acks from s390 on the kvm_is_error_gpa() => kvm_is_gpa_in_memslot()
> refactor. Fudge.
>
> s390 folks, my apologies for not reaching out earlier. Please take a look at
> commit 9e7325acb3dc ("KVM: s390: Refactor kvm_is_error_gpa() into
> kvm_is_gpa_in_memslot()"). It *should* be a straight refactor, and I don't
> expect the rename to be contentious, but I didn't intend to send this pull request
> before getting an explicit ack.
kvm_is_gpa_in_memslot() is not my preferred name for this function but
it's way better than kvm_is_error_gpa() so I'm fine with it.
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists