linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] KVM: Xen and gfn_to_pfn

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:02:05 +0100
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM: Xen and gfn_to_pfn_cache changes for 6.9

On 3/8/24 23:37, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Aaaand seeing my one commit in the shortlog made me realize I completely forgot
> to get acks from s390 on the kvm_is_error_gpa() => kvm_is_gpa_in_memslot()
> refactor.  Fudge.
> 
> s390 folks, my apologies for not reaching out earlier.  Please take a look at
> commit 9e7325acb3dc ("KVM: s390: Refactor kvm_is_error_gpa() into
> kvm_is_gpa_in_memslot()").  It *should* be a straight refactor, and I don't
> expect the rename to be contentious, but I didn't intend to send this pull request
> before getting an explicit ack.


kvm_is_gpa_in_memslot() is not my preferred name for this function but 
it's way better than kvm_is_error_gpa() so I'm fine with it.

Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>