[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf98ff2f-66a8-4800-855f-5c03c952b514@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:08:36 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
"kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [Test Failure Report] exec: Test failures in execveat
On 3/8/24 1:39 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 02:22:27PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> I've tested this patch. Still getting same failures.
>
> Okay, thanks for testing!
>
> What environment are you testing under? It would seem like some unexpected
> userspace conditions exist that the test isn't prepared for. (I was able
> to reproduce one error with /bin/dash, for example, but not the others,
> so something must be different in the set up.)
I'm testing on Debian Bookworm with v6.1, v6.7 and next-20240304 kernels.
I've tested it on another VM which is also Debian Bookworm. The default
shell is dash on Debian as well.
>
> -Kees
>
--
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists