linux-kernel - Re: [Test Failure Report] exec: Test failures in execveat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:08:36 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
 Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 "kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [Test Failure Report] exec: Test failures in execveat

On 3/8/24 1:39 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 02:22:27PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> I've tested this patch. Still getting same failures.
> 
> Okay, thanks for testing!
> 
> What environment are you testing under? It would seem like some unexpected
> userspace conditions exist that the test isn't prepared for. (I was able
> to reproduce one error with /bin/dash, for example, but not the others,
> so something must be different in the set up.)
I'm testing on Debian Bookworm with v6.1, v6.7 and next-20240304 kernels.
I've tested it on another VM which is also Debian Bookworm. The default
shell is dash on Debian as well.

> 
> -Kees
> 

-- 
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum