[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f877ce53-a5ee-4447-a57c-339a1e9701f4@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:10:21 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] selftests/exec: Add the overall result line
accourding to TAP
Soft reminder!
On 3/4/24 8:59 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> The following line is missing from the test's execution. Add it to make
> it fully TAP conformant:
> # Totals: pass:27 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/exec/binfmt_script.py | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/exec/binfmt_script.py b/tools/testing/selftests/exec/binfmt_script.py
> index 05f94a741c7aa..2c575a2c0eab4 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/exec/binfmt_script.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/exec/binfmt_script.py
> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ SIZE=256
> NAME_MAX=int(subprocess.check_output(["getconf", "NAME_MAX", "."]))
>
> test_num=0
> +pass_num=0
> +fail_num=0
>
> code='''#!/usr/bin/perl
> print "Executed interpreter! Args:\n";
> @@ -42,7 +44,7 @@ foreach my $a (@ARGV) {
> # ...
> def test(name, size, good=True, leading="", root="./", target="/perl",
> fill="A", arg="", newline="\n", hashbang="#!"):
> - global test_num, tests, NAME_MAX
> + global test_num, pass_num, fail_num, tests, NAME_MAX
> test_num += 1
> if test_num > tests:
> raise ValueError("more binfmt_script tests than expected! (want %d, expected %d)"
> @@ -80,16 +82,20 @@ def test(name, size, good=True, leading="", root="./", target="/perl",
> if good:
> print("ok %d - binfmt_script %s (successful good exec)"
> % (test_num, name))
> + pass_num += 1
> else:
> print("not ok %d - binfmt_script %s succeeded when it should have failed"
> % (test_num, name))
> + fail_num = 1
> else:
> if good:
> print("not ok %d - binfmt_script %s failed when it should have succeeded (rc:%d)"
> % (test_num, name, proc.returncode))
> + fail_num = 1
> else:
> print("ok %d - binfmt_script %s (correctly failed bad exec)"
> % (test_num, name))
> + pass_num += 1
>
> # Clean up crazy binaries
> os.unlink(script)
> @@ -166,6 +172,8 @@ test(name="two-under-trunc-arg", size=int(SIZE/2), arg=" ")
> test(name="two-under-leading", size=int(SIZE/2), leading=" ")
> test(name="two-under-lead-trunc-arg", size=int(SIZE/2), leading=" ", arg=" ")
>
> +print("# Totals: pass:%d fail:%d xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0" % (pass_num, fail_num))
> +
> if test_num != tests:
> raise ValueError("fewer binfmt_script tests than expected! (ran %d, expected %d"
> % (test_num, tests))
--
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists