[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e525e9ac-b745-49f5-b219-b4dca77c658d@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:06:16 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.8
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 02:06:37PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
[ ... ]
> everybody who sent in early pull requests, you know who you are. But
> before that excitement commences, please do spend a bit of time with
> the now boring old status quo and give 6.8 a good test, ok?
>
Build results:
total: 158 pass: 158 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 549 pass: 549 fail: 0
Unit test results:
pass: 215772 fail: 302
Nothing news, really. Unit test failures are retty much unchanged.
- mean_and_variance_test_2 and mean_and_variance_test_4 are still broken
both in mainline and linux-next.
- m68k:q800:stackinit should be fixed in linux-next
- most of the IP checksum test failures are still present in mainline but
fixed in linux-next. One notable and still unhandled checksum test
failure is the failure seen in sh4 emulations. It is due to upstream
commit cadc4e1a2b4d ("sh: Handle calling csum_partial with misaligned
data") which is broken and would have to be either fixed or reverted.
I added it to the regression tracker, so it should show up there in
the near future.
There are also still some warning backtraces.
- dev-addr-list-test with lock debugging triggers backtraces due to
conceptual problems with kunit tests (locks are not necessarily
requested and released from the same thread).
- WARNING: inconsistent lock state in stmmac code.
Tracked in regression tracker.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists