[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ghmdr7gksgdedikslax2wdxfzzifu3drviuhifbshhvgksmxjr@7giez2rzppil>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:27:27 -0700
From: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@...amperecomputing.com>
To: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@...wei.com>
Cc: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, rafael@...nel.org, sumitg@...dia.com, zengheng4@...wei.com,
yang@...amperecomputing.com, will@...nel.org, sudeep.holla@....com, liuyonglong@...wei.com,
zhanjie9@...ilicon.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] arm64: idle: Cache AMU counters before
entering idle
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 11:17:26AM +0800, lihuisong (C) wrote:
>
>在 2024/3/1 0:25, Vanshidhar Konda 写道:
>>AMU counters do not increment while a CPU is in idle. Saving the value
>>of the core and constant counters prior to invoking WFI allows FIE to
>>compute the frequency of a CPU that is idle.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@...amperecomputing.com>
>>---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 14 ++++++++------
>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c
>>index 05cfb347ec26..5ed2e57188a8 100644
>>--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c
>>+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c
>>@@ -26,6 +26,16 @@ void __cpuidle cpu_do_idle(void)
>> arm_cpuidle_save_irq_context(&context);
>>+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN
>>+ /* Update the AMU counters before entering WFI. The cached AMU counter
>>+ * value is used to determine CPU frequency while the CPU is idle
>>+ * without needing to wake up the CPU.
>>+ */
>>+
>>+ if (cpu_has_amu_feat(smp_processor_id()))
>>+ update_freq_counters_refs();
>>+#endif
>The below point I has mentioned in [1].
>This is just for the WFI state.
>What about other deeper idle states, like retention and power down?
>The path to enter idle state is different for them. We should do this
>for all idle states.
>
Yes. That makes sense. I'll account for them in the next version of the
patch. I'll work on the next version of the patch based on the updated
patch from @Beata.
Thanks,
Vanshi
>>+
>> dsb(sy);
>> wfi();
>>diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
>>index db8d14525cf4..8905eb0c681f 100644
>>--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
>>+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
>>@@ -240,13 +240,15 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
>> } while (read_seqcount_retry(&cpu_sample->seq, seq));
>> /*
>>- * Bail on invalid count and when the last update was too long ago,
>>- * which covers idle and NOHZ full CPUs.
>>+ * Bail on invalid count and when the last update was too long ago.
>>+ * This covers idle, NOHZ full and isolated CPUs.
>>+ *
>>+ * Idle CPUs don't need to be measured because AMU counters stop
>>+ * incrementing during WFI/WFE.
>> */
>>- if (!delta_const_cnt || ((jiffies - last) > MAX_SAMPLE_AGE)) {
>>- if (!(housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TICK) && idle_cpu(cpu)))
>>- goto fallback;
>>- }
>>+ if (!delta_const_cnt ||
>>+ ((jiffies - last) > MAX_SAMPLE_AGE && !idle_cpu(cpu)))
>>+ goto fallback;
>> /*
>> * CPU frequency = reference perf (in Hz) * (/\ delivered) / (/\ reference)
>[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20231212072617.14756-1-lihuisong@huawei.com/
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists