[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fa04abad-9191-4333-bcad-9b37ac23e6aa@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:06:04 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/resctrl: Simplify call convention for MSR
update functions
On 3/8/24 15:38, Tony Luck wrote:
> The per-resource MSR update functions cat_wrmsr(), mba_wrmsr_intel(),
> and mba_wrmsr_amd() all take three arguments:
>
> (struct rdt_domain *d, struct msr_param *m, struct rdt_resource *r)
>
> struct msr_param contains pointers to both struct rdt_resource and struct
> rdt_domain, thus only struct msr_param is necessary.
>
> Pass struct msr_param as a single parameter. Clean up formatting and
> fix some fir tree declaration ordering.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Suggested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists