linux-kernel - Re: Unexplained long boot delays [Was Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.9]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f324cf7f-f5ff-4f19-b6ee-3a47870766b8@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:15:41 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
	mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
	joel@...lfernandes.org, neeraj.upadhyay@....com, urezki@...il.com,
	qiang.zhang1211@...il.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
	anna-maria@...utronix.de, chenzhongjin@...wei.com,
	yangjihong1@...wei.com, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: Unexplained long boot delays [Was Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for
 v6.9]

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 10:01:00PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 01:32:03PM -0700, Florian Fainelli a écrit :
> > Hi Boqun,
> > 
> > On 3/8/24 09:15, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > Hi Linus,
> > > 
> > > Please pull this for the RCU changes of v6.9:
> > > 
> > > The following changes since commit 41bccc98fb7931d63d03f326a746ac4d429c1dd3:
> > > 
> > >    Linux 6.8-rc2 (2024-01-28 17:01:12 -0800)
> > > 
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > 
> > >    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/boqun/linux.git tags/rcu.next.v6.9
> > > 
> > > for you to fetch changes up to 3add00be5fe5810d7aa5ec3af8b6a245ef33144b:
> > > 
> > >    Merge branches 'rcu-doc.2024.02.14a', 'rcu-nocb.2024.02.14a', 'rcu-exp.2024.02.14a', 'rcu-tasks.2024.02.26a' and 'rcu-misc.2024.02.14a' into rcu.2024.02.26a (2024-02-26 17:37:25 -0800)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Two merge conflicts were detected by linux-next:
> > > 
> > > * https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240226135745.12ac854d@canb.auug.org.au/
> > > * https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240227125522.2bdbe6be@canb.auug.org.au/
> > > 
> > > These conflict resolutions from linux-next look good to me, plus I made
> > > my own resolutions at branch merge/rcu.2024.02.27a for your reference.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Some highlights of the changes:
> > > 
> > > * Eliminates deadlocks involving do_exit() and RCU tasks, by Paul:
> > >    Instead of SRCU read side critical sections, now a percpu list is used
> > >    in do_exit() for scaning yet-to-exit tasks.
> > > 
> > > * Fixes a deadlock due to the dependency between workqueue and RCU
> > >    expedited grace period, reported by Anna-Maria Behnsen and Thomas
> > >    Gleixner and fixed by Frederic: Now RCU expedited always uses its own
> > >    kthread worker instead of a workqueue.
> > 
> > At least one device in my test farm (ARM 32-bit) has consistently shown a
> > very long boot, and some others are intermittently affected. This
> > consistently looks like this on most of my devices:
> > 
> > [    2.450351] bcmgenet f0480000.ethernet: GENET 5.0 EPHY: 0x0000
> > [    2.547562] ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> > [  162.107264] unimac-mdio unimac-mdio.0: Broadcom UniMAC MDIO bus
> > 
> > this gets flagged by my boot script as a boot failure since we exceeded the
> > 30 seconds timeout given to boot a kernel to a prompt.
> > 
> > It has been somewhat difficult to get a reliable bisection going on, but
> > what I am sure of is that e5a3878c947ceef7b6ab68fdc093f3848059842c~1 does
> > not expose the problem for 10 consecutive boots, while I *might* see it at
> > e5a3878c947ceef7b6ab68fdc093f3848059842c and beyond.
> > 
> > Any clues what is going on here?
> 
> I understand it doesn't reliably reproduce. But is there any chance you could
> test that alone?
> 
>      0bb11a372fc8 (rcu-tasks: Maintain real-time response in rcu_tasks_postscan())
> 
> And if it reproduces there try a bisection?
> 
> git bisect bad 0bb11a372fc8d7006b4d0f42a2882939747bdbff
> git bisect good 41bccc98fb7931d63d03f326a746ac4d429c1dd3

Good point!

Is this kernel built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y and CONFIG_TASKS_RCU=y?
Either way, is there also a large number of tasks exiting at this point
during boot?

							Thanx, Paul