linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/14] kunit: bug: Count suppressed warning backtraces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202403121501.F7CA06C@keescook>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:02:05 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Daniel Diaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
	David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
	Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo@...eup.net>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
	Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
	netdev@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] kunit: bug: Count suppressed warning backtraces

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 10:02:57AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Count suppressed warning backtraces to enable code which suppresses
> warning backtraces to check if the expected backtrace(s) have been
> observed.
> 
> Using atomics for the backtrace count resulted in build errors on some
> architectures due to include file recursion, so use a plain integer
> for now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
>  include/kunit/bug.h | 7 ++++++-
>  lib/kunit/bug.c     | 4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kunit/bug.h b/include/kunit/bug.h
> index 1e34da961599..2097a854ac8c 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/bug.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/bug.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  struct __suppressed_warning {
>  	struct list_head node;
>  	const char *function;
> +	int counter;

Thanks for adding a counter!

>  };
>  
>  void __start_suppress_warning(struct __suppressed_warning *warning);
> @@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ bool __is_suppressed_warning(const char *function);
>  
>  #define DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func)	\
>  	struct __suppressed_warning __kunit_suppress_##func = \
> -		{ .function = __stringify(func) }
> +		{ .function = __stringify(func), .counter = 0 }
>  
>  #define START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func) \
>  	__start_suppress_warning(&__kunit_suppress_##func)
> @@ -39,12 +40,16 @@ bool __is_suppressed_warning(const char *function);
>  #define IS_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func) \
>  	__is_suppressed_warning(func)
>  
> +#define SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(func) \
> +	(__kunit_suppress_##func.counter)
> +
>  #else /* CONFIG_KUNIT */
>  
>  #define DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func)
>  #define START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func)
>  #define END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func)
>  #define IS_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(func) (false)
> +#define SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(func) (0)
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_KUNIT */
>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/bug.c b/lib/kunit/bug.c
> index f93544d7a9d1..13b3d896c114 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/bug.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/bug.c
> @@ -32,8 +32,10 @@ bool __is_suppressed_warning(const char *function)
>  		return false;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(warning, &suppressed_warnings, node) {
> -		if (!strcmp(function, warning->function))
> +		if (!strcmp(function, warning->function)) {
> +			warning->counter++;
>  			return true;
> +		}
>  	}
>  	return false;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook