lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXdTG=r8CJOGg2+xqMbrJ_uA3_EkoU9F2gq+zok2cGJpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:43:50 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, 
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, Chanho Min <chanho.min@....com>, 
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, tsahee@...apurnalabs.com, atenart@...nel.org, 
	robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	rjui@...adcom.com, sbranden@...adcom.com, andrew@...n.ch, 
	gregory.clement@...tlin.com, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, 
	matthias.bgg@...il.com, magnus.damm@...il.com, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 12/12] arm64: dts: Fix dtc interrupt_provider warnings

Hi Pavel,

On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 9:38 AM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > > > From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > >
> > > > [ Upstream commit 91adecf911e5df78ea3e8f866e69db2c33416a5c ]
> > > >
> > > > The dtc interrupt_provider warning is off by default. Fix all the warnings
> > > > so it can be enabled.
> > >
> > > We don't have that warning in 6.1 and likely won't enable it, so we
> > > should not need this.
> >
> > Still, this fixes issues in DTS that were not noticed before because
> > the checks were disabled.
>
> Is this patch known to fix user-visible behaviour?

None that I am aware of.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68korg

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ