[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240312-orten-erbsen-2105c134762e@brauner>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:47:52 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ovl: fix the parsing of empty string mount
parameters
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 03:39:39PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 14:25, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, so with that I do agree. But have you read my reply to the other
> > thread? I'd like to hear your thoughs on that. The problem is that
> > mount(8) currently does:
> >
> > fsconfig(3, FSCONFIG_SET_FLAG, "usrjquota", NULL, 0) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
> >
> > for both -o usrjquota and -o usrjquota=
>
> For "-o usrjquota" this seems right.
>
> For "-o usrjquota=" it doesn't. Flags should never have that "=", so
> this seems buggy in more than one ways.
>
> > So we need a clear contract with userspace or the in-kernel solution
> > proposed here. I see the following options:
> >
> > (1) Userspace must know that mount options such as "usrjquota" that can
> > have no value must be specified as "usrjquota=" when passed to
> > mount(8). This in turn means we need to tell Karel to update
> > mount(8) to recognize this and infer from "usrjquota=" that it must
> > be passed as FSCONFIG_SET_STRING.
>
> Yes, this is what I'm thinking. Of course this only works if there
> are no backward compatibility issues, if "-o usrjquota" worked in the
> past and some systems out there relied on this, then this is not
> sufficient.
Ok, I spoke to Karel and filed:
https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2837
So this should get sorted soon.
> > https://github.com/brauner/man-pages-md/blob/main/fsconfig.md
>
> What's the plan with these? It would be good if "man fsconfig" would
> finally work.
Yeah, I have this on my todo list but it hasn't been high-prio for me
and it is just so so nice to update the manpages in markdown.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists