[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874jdb4xk8.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:19:19 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: "Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" <horenchuang@...edance.com>
Cc: "Gregory Price" <gourry.memverge@...il.com>,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, mhocko@...e.com, tj@...nel.org,
john@...alactic.com, "Eishan Mirakhur" <emirakhur@...ron.com>,
"Vinicius Tavares Petrucci" <vtavarespetr@...ron.com>, "Ravis OpenSrc"
<Ravis.OpenSrc@...ron.com>, "Alistair Popple" <apopple@...dia.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Vishal Verma
<vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Andrew
Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, "Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang"
<horenc@...edu>, "Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" <horenchuang@...il.com>,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org, Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] memory tier: acpi/hmat: create CPUless memory
tiers after obtaining HMAT info
"Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" <horenchuang@...edance.com> writes:
> The current implementation treats emulated memory devices, such as
> CXL1.1 type3 memory, as normal DRAM when they are emulated as normal memory
> (E820_TYPE_RAM). However, these emulated devices have different
> characteristics than traditional DRAM, making it important to
> distinguish them. Thus, we modify the tiered memory initialization process
> to introduce a delay specifically for CPUless NUMA nodes. This delay
> ensures that the memory tier initialization for these nodes is deferred
> until HMAT information is obtained during the boot process. Finally,
> demotion tables are recalculated at the end.
>
> * Abstract common functions into `find_alloc_memory_type()`
We should move kmem_put_memory_types() (renamed to
mt_put_memory_types()?) too. This can be put in a separate patch.
> Since different memory devices require finding or allocating a memory type,
> these common steps are abstracted into a single function,
> `find_alloc_memory_type()`, enhancing code scalability and conciseness.
>
> * Handle cases where there is no HMAT when creating memory tiers
> There is a scenario where a CPUless node does not provide HMAT information.
> If no HMAT is specified, it falls back to using the default DRAM tier.
>
> * Change adist calculation code to use another new lock, mt_perf_lock.
> In the current implementation, iterating through CPUlist nodes requires
> holding the `memory_tier_lock`. However, `mt_calc_adistance()` will end up
> trying to acquire the same lock, leading to a potential deadlock.
> Therefore, we propose introducing a standalone `mt_perf_lock` to protect
> `default_dram_perf`. This approach not only avoids deadlock but also
> prevents holding a large lock simultaneously.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horenchuang@...edance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@...edance.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 11 ++++++
> drivers/dax/kmem.c | 13 +------
> include/linux/acpi.h | 6 ++++
> include/linux/memory-tiers.h | 8 +++++
> mm/memory-tiers.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 5 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> index d6b85f0f6082..28812ec2c793 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ static LIST_HEAD(targets);
> static LIST_HEAD(initiators);
> static LIST_HEAD(localities);
>
> +static LIST_HEAD(hmat_memory_types);
> +
HMAT isn't a device driver for some memory devices. So I don't think we
should manage memory types in HMAT. Instead, if the memory_type of a
node isn't set by the driver, we should manage it in memory-tier.c as
fallback.
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(target_lock);
>
> /*
> @@ -149,6 +151,12 @@ int acpi_get_genport_coordinates(u32 uid,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(acpi_get_genport_coordinates, CXL);
>
> +struct memory_dev_type *hmat_find_alloc_memory_type(int adist)
> +{
> + return find_alloc_memory_type(adist, &hmat_memory_types);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hmat_find_alloc_memory_type);
> +
> static __init void alloc_memory_initiator(unsigned int cpu_pxm)
> {
> struct memory_initiator *initiator;
> @@ -1038,6 +1046,9 @@ static __init int hmat_init(void)
> if (!hmat_set_default_dram_perf())
> register_mt_adistance_algorithm(&hmat_adist_nb);
>
> + /* Post-create CPUless memory tiers after getting HMAT info */
> + memory_tier_late_init();
> +
This should be called in memory-tier.c via
late_initcall(memory_tier_late_init);
Then, we don't need hmat to call it.
> return 0;
> out_put:
> hmat_free_structures();
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/kmem.c b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> index 42ee360cf4e3..aee17ab59f4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> @@ -55,21 +55,10 @@ static LIST_HEAD(kmem_memory_types);
>
> static struct memory_dev_type *kmem_find_alloc_memory_type(int adist)
> {
> - bool found = false;
> struct memory_dev_type *mtype;
>
> mutex_lock(&kmem_memory_type_lock);
> - list_for_each_entry(mtype, &kmem_memory_types, list) {
> - if (mtype->adistance == adist) {
> - found = true;
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> - if (!found) {
> - mtype = alloc_memory_type(adist);
> - if (!IS_ERR(mtype))
> - list_add(&mtype->list, &kmem_memory_types);
> - }
> + mtype = find_alloc_memory_type(adist, &kmem_memory_types);
> mutex_unlock(&kmem_memory_type_lock);
>
> return mtype;
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index b7165e52b3c6..3f927ff01f02 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -434,12 +434,18 @@ int thermal_acpi_critical_trip_temp(struct acpi_device *adev, int *ret_temp);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HMAT
> int acpi_get_genport_coordinates(u32 uid, struct access_coordinate *coord);
> +struct memory_dev_type *hmat_find_alloc_memory_type(int adist);
> #else
> static inline int acpi_get_genport_coordinates(u32 uid,
> struct access_coordinate *coord)
> {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
> +
> +static inline struct memory_dev_type *hmat_find_alloc_memory_type(int adist)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> index 69e781900082..4bc2596c5774 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ int mt_calc_adistance(int node, int *adist);
> int mt_set_default_dram_perf(int nid, struct access_coordinate *perf,
> const char *source);
> int mt_perf_to_adistance(struct access_coordinate *perf, int *adist);
> +struct memory_dev_type *find_alloc_memory_type(int adist,
> + struct list_head *memory_types);
> +void memory_tier_late_init(void);
> #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> int next_demotion_node(int node);
> void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets);
> @@ -136,5 +139,10 @@ static inline int mt_perf_to_adistance(struct access_coordinate *perf, int *adis
> {
> return -EIO;
> }
> +
> +static inline void memory_tier_late_init(void)
> +{
> +
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> #endif /* _LINUX_MEMORY_TIERS_H */
> diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> index 0537664620e5..79f748d60e6f 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/memory.h>
> #include <linux/memory-tiers.h>
> #include <linux/notifier.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> @@ -35,6 +36,7 @@ struct node_memory_type_map {
> };
>
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(memory_tier_lock);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(mt_perf_lock);
Please add comments about what it protects. And put it near the data
structure it protects.
> static LIST_HEAD(memory_tiers);
> static struct node_memory_type_map node_memory_types[MAX_NUMNODES];
> struct memory_dev_type *default_dram_type;
> @@ -623,6 +625,58 @@ void clear_node_memory_type(int node, struct memory_dev_type *memtype)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clear_node_memory_type);
>
> +struct memory_dev_type *find_alloc_memory_type(int adist, struct list_head *memory_types)
> +{
> + bool found = false;
> + struct memory_dev_type *mtype;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(mtype, memory_types, list) {
> + if (mtype->adistance == adist) {
> + found = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + if (!found) {
> + mtype = alloc_memory_type(adist);
> + if (!IS_ERR(mtype))
> + list_add(&mtype->list, memory_types);
> + }
> +
> + return mtype;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(find_alloc_memory_type);
> +
> +static void memory_tier_late_create(int node)
> +{
> + struct memory_dev_type *mtype = NULL;
> + int adist = MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM;
> +
> + mt_calc_adistance(node, &adist);
> + if (adist != MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM) {
We can manage default_dram_type() via find_alloc_memory_type()
too.
And, if "node_memory_types[node].memtype == NULL", we can call
mt_calc_adistance(node, &adist) and find_alloc_memory_type() in
set_node_memory_tier(). Then, we can cover hotpluged memory node too.
> + mtype = hmat_find_alloc_memory_type(adist);
> + if (!IS_ERR(mtype))
> + __init_node_memory_type(node, mtype);
> + else
> + pr_err("Failed to allocate a memory type at %s()\n", __func__);
> + }
> +
> + set_node_memory_tier(node);
> +}
> +
> +void memory_tier_late_init(void)
> +{
> + int nid;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock);
> + for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY)
> + if (!node_state(nid, N_CPU))
We should exclude "node_memory_types[nid].memtype != NULL". Some memory
nodes may be onlined by some device drivers and setup memory tiers
already.
> + memory_tier_late_create(nid);
> +
> + establish_demotion_targets();
> + mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_tier_late_init);
> +
> static void dump_hmem_attrs(struct access_coordinate *coord, const char *prefix)
> {
> pr_info(
> @@ -636,7 +690,7 @@ int mt_set_default_dram_perf(int nid, struct access_coordinate *perf,
> {
> int rc = 0;
>
> - mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&mt_perf_lock);
> if (default_dram_perf_error) {
> rc = -EIO;
> goto out;
> @@ -684,7 +738,7 @@ int mt_set_default_dram_perf(int nid, struct access_coordinate *perf,
> }
>
> out:
> - mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&mt_perf_lock);
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@ -700,7 +754,7 @@ int mt_perf_to_adistance(struct access_coordinate *perf, int *adist)
> perf->read_bandwidth + perf->write_bandwidth == 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&mt_perf_lock);
> /*
> * The abstract distance of a memory node is in direct proportion to
> * its memory latency (read + write) and inversely proportional to its
> @@ -713,7 +767,7 @@ int mt_perf_to_adistance(struct access_coordinate *perf, int *adist)
> (default_dram_perf.read_latency + default_dram_perf.write_latency) *
> (default_dram_perf.read_bandwidth + default_dram_perf.write_bandwidth) /
> (perf->read_bandwidth + perf->write_bandwidth);
> - mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&mt_perf_lock);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -836,6 +890,14 @@ static int __init memory_tier_init(void)
> * types assigned.
> */
> for_each_node_state(node, N_MEMORY) {
> + if (!node_state(node, N_CPU))
> + /*
> + * Defer memory tier initialization on CPUless numa nodes.
> + * These will be initialized when HMAT information is
HMAT is platform specific, we should avoid to mention it in general code
if possible.
> + * available.
> + */
> + continue;
> +
> memtier = set_node_memory_tier(node);
> if (IS_ERR(memtier))
> /*
--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists