lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06cfa3459ed848cf8f228997b983cf53@h3c.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:04:54 +0000
From: Liuye <liu.yeC@....com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
CC: "jason.wessel@...driver.com" <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
        "dianders@...omium.org" <dianders@...omium.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org"
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "jirislaby@...nel.org" <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        "kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net"
	<kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] kdb: Fix the deadlock issue in KDB debugging.

>On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 08:37:11AM +0000, Liuye wrote:
>> I know that you said schedule_work is not NMI save, which is the first 
>> issue. Perhaps it can be fixed using irq_work_queue. But even if 
>> irq_work_queue is used to implement it, there will still be a deadlock 
>> problem because slave cpu1 still has not released the running queue 
>> lock of master CPU0.
>
>This doesn't sound right to me. Why do you think CPU1 won't release the run queue lock?

In this example, CPU1 is waiting for CPU0 to release dbg_slave_lock.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ