| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <m2v85racnp.fsf@posteo.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:54:18 +0000
From: Anne Macedo <retpolanne@...teo.net>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland
<mark.rutland@....com>, Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian
Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf lock contention: skip traceiter functions
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:57 PM Anne Macedo <retpolanne@...teo.net> wrote:
>>
>> The perf lock contention program currently shows the caller of the locks
>> as __traceiter_contention_begin+0x??. This caller can be ignored, as it is
>> from the traceiter itself. Instead, it should show the real callers for
>> the locks.
>>
>> When fiddling with the --stack-skip parameter, the actual callers for
>> the locks start to show up. However, just ignore the
>> __traceiter_contention_begin and the __traceiter_contention_end symbols
>> so the actual callers will show up.
>>
>> Before this patch is applied:
>>
>> sudo perf lock con -a -b -- sleep 3
>> contended total wait max wait avg wait type caller
>>
>> 8 2.33 s 2.28 s 291.18 ms rwlock:W __traceiter_contention_begin+0x44
>> 4 2.33 s 2.28 s 582.35 ms rwlock:W __traceiter_contention_begin+0x44
>> 7 140.30 ms 46.77 ms 20.04 ms rwlock:W __traceiter_contention_begin+0x44
>> 2 63.35 ms 33.76 ms 31.68 ms mutex trace_contention_begin+0x84
>> 2 46.74 ms 46.73 ms 23.37 ms rwlock:W __traceiter_contention_begin+0x44
>> 1 13.54 us 13.54 us 13.54 us mutex trace_contention_begin+0x84
>> 1 3.67 us 3.67 us 3.67 us rwsem:R __traceiter_contention_begin+0x44
>>
>> Before this patch is applied - using --stack-skip 5
>>
>> sudo perf lock con --stack-skip 5 -a -b -- sleep 3
>> contended total wait max wait avg wait type caller
>>
>> 2 2.24 s 2.24 s 1.12 s rwlock:W do_epoll_wait+0x5a0
>> 4 1.65 s 824.21 ms 412.08 ms rwlock:W do_exit+0x338
>> 2 824.35 ms 824.29 ms 412.17 ms spinlock get_signal+0x108
>> 2 824.14 ms 824.14 ms 412.07 ms rwlock:W release_task+0x68
>> 1 25.22 ms 25.22 ms 25.22 ms mutex cgroup_kn_lock_live+0x58
>> 1 24.71 us 24.71 us 24.71 us spinlock do_exit+0x44
>> 1 22.04 us 22.04 us 22.04 us rwsem:R lock_mm_and_find_vma+0xb0
>>
>> After this patch is applied:
>>
>> sudo ./perf lock con -a -b -- sleep 3
>> contended total wait max wait avg wait type caller
>>
>> 4 4.13 s 2.07 s 1.03 s rwlock:W release_task+0x68
>> 2 2.07 s 2.07 s 1.03 s rwlock:R mm_update_next_owner+0x50
>> 2 2.07 s 2.07 s 1.03 s rwlock:W do_exit+0x338
>> 1 41.56 ms 41.56 ms 41.56 ms mutex cgroup_kn_lock_live+0x58
>> 2 36.12 us 18.83 us 18.06 us rwlock:W do_exit+0x338
>>
>> changes since v1:
>>
>> - consider trace_contention and __traceiter_contention functions as
>> optional (i.e. check if sym is null to avoid segfault)
>>
>> changes since v0:
>>
>> - skip trace_contention functions
>> - use sym->end instead of __traceiter_contention_end for text_end
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anne Macedo <retpolanne@...teo.net>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/machine.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> tools/perf/util/machine.h | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
>> index 527517db3182..968f69364f9a 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
>> @@ -3266,6 +3266,18 @@ bool machine__is_lock_function(struct machine *machine, u64 addr)
>>
>> sym = machine__find_kernel_symbol_by_name(machine, "__lock_text_end", &kmap);
>> machine->lock.text_end = map__unmap_ip(kmap, sym->start);
>> +
>> + sym = machine__find_kernel_symbol_by_name(machine, "__traceiter_contention_begin", &kmap);
>> + if (sym) {
>> + machine->traceiter.text_start = map__unmap_ip(kmap, sym->start);
>> + machine->traceiter.text_end = map__unmap_ip(kmap, sym->end);
>> + }
>> +
>> + sym = machine__find_kernel_symbol_by_name(machine, "trace_contention_begin", &kmap);
>> + if (sym) {
>> + machine->trace.text_start = map__unmap_ip(kmap, sym->start);
>> + machine->trace.text_end = map__unmap_ip(kmap, sym->end);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /* failed to get kernel symbols */
>> @@ -3280,5 +3292,14 @@ bool machine__is_lock_function(struct machine *machine, u64 addr)
>> if (machine->lock.text_start <= addr && addr < machine->lock.text_end)
>> return true;
>>
>> + /* traceiter functions currently don't have their own section
>> + * but we consider them lock functions
>> + */
>> + if (machine->traceiter.text_start <= addr && addr < machine->traceiter.text_end)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + if (machine->trace.text_start <= addr && addr < machine->tracetext_end)
>> + return true;
>
> You cannot simply check these as they are set optionally.
>
Should I move them to the same if block where I check for the sym?
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
>> +
>> return false;
>> }
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.h b/tools/perf/util/machine.h
>> index e28c787616fe..4312f6db6de0 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.h
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.h
>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct machine {
>> struct {
>> u64 text_start;
>> u64 text_end;
>> - } sched, lock;
>> + } sched, lock, traceiter, trace;
>> pid_t *current_tid;
>> size_t current_tid_sz;
>> union { /* Tool specific area */
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
Thanks, Anne
Powered by blists - more mailing lists